Law Law Essay

1187 WordsJan 20, 20145 Pages
Duty Stennet v Hancock- repairers case. | Fisher v Harrods LTD – retailers of jewelry Breach Grant v Australian Knitting Mills: C needs to have the knowledge of a RM | Kubach v Hollands: a proper warning needed. Causation Evans v Triplex Safety Glass Damage Stennet v Hancock and Fisher v Harrods Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Kubach v Hollands Evans v Triplex Safety Glass Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialties Aswan Engineering v Lupdine LTD Griffiths v Arch Engineering Abouzaid v Mothercare Abouzaid v Mothercare Abouzaid v Mothercare Abouzaid v Mothercare A v National Blood Authority Richardson v LRC Products ltd Worley v Tombrands- tampons Bogle v McDonald’s Restaurants Spartan Steel v Martin & Co Cattle v Stockton Waterwarks Weller v Foot and Mouth Disease Reasearch Institutution Candler v Crane, Christmas and Co Hedley Byrne v Heller Lennon v MPC Goodwill v BPAS Smith v Bush Page v Smith Donachie v Chief Constabe of Gtr Manchester White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Chadwick v British Railways Board Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Bourhill v Young McLoughlin v O’Brian Galli- Atkinson v Seghal Sion v Hampster HA Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust Greatorex v Greatorex Dooley v Cammell Laird W v Essex County Council Stennet v Hancock Fisher v Harrods Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Kubach v Hollands Evans v Triplex Safety Glass Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialites Aswan Engeneering v Lupdine LTD Griffiths v Arch Engeneering Doubzaid v Mothercare A v National Blood Authority Richards v LRC Priducts Worley v Tombrands Bogle v McDonnald’s Restaurants Spartan Steel v Martin & Co Cattle v Stockton Waterworks Weller v Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institution Barnett v Chealsea &

More about Law Law Essay

Open Document