His family is quite wealthy, and he visits a private boarding school. Like every other teenager, Holden acts typically like a teenager. His statements and assertions are often unnecessary and uninteresting, and have an arrogant tone. Holden judges people based on their suitcases, since he thinks it is “really hard to be roommates with people if your suitcases are better than theirs.” This statement just comes out of nowhere and completely irritates the reader. Holden implies by mentioning his thought, that roommates with cheap suitcases are hard to be with, that he is a special person that everyone envies and is jealous of.
He was a ‘man of the people’ since he spoke simple, coarse language as he was born into a Georgian peasant family. After ‘Lenin Enrolment’, Stalin’s popularity within the party surged as he could sympathize with the many illiterate party members from lower class backgrounds. In contrast, his contenders were portrayed as upper class personnel due to their wealthier backgrounds. His main opposition, Trotsky, was an intellect and a gifted orator, however this gave him an air of arrogance. His complicated public speeches gained him less support than Stalin’s connection with the working class.
gatsby "Wealth is a bottomless pit which will only be achieved through questioning the fibre of a person’s moral principles.” In light of this view, Compare and Contrast the treatment of wealth and moral principles in The Great Gatsby and A handful of Dust In The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald offers commentary on a variety of themes justice, power, greed, betrayal and the American Dream. Of all the themes, perhaps none is better developed than that of the treatment of wealth. Offering a vivid peek into American life in the 1920s, Fitzgerald carefully creates distinct social classes’ old money, new money, and no money. Often considered her finest work, Evelyn Waugh’s A Handful of Dust focuses the majority of the novel’s tension on Tony Last’s mostly humorous endeavours to keep his anachronistic values in an increasingly volatile society. A handful of Dust was written by Evelyn Waugh; and was published in the year 1934.
How far do you agree with Nicks views that Gatsby is ‘worth the whole damn bunch put together?’ Nicks views about Jay Gatsby, ‘the man who gives his name to this book’ can be viewed as biased as Fitzgerald uses Nick as a way to manipulate the reader into Nick’s way of thinking. Is Gatsby worth the whole damn bunch put together? Gatsby is worth the whole bunch put together based on his material qualities which is accumulated from shady business. Gatsby’s rags-to-riches success story makes him an embodiment of the American dream that contrasts with Tom who has become wealthy due to his inheritance. Although Gatsby has accumulated his wealth from shady business, his love for Daisy has remained for the 5 years he has gone without seeing her which portrays the lengths that he will go to in order to achieve his only ‘dream’ thus reinforcing Gatsby’s hope being worthy over the rest.
As these show, Odysseus lacks of many heroic attributes even after his burdensome journey. However, it is an inevitable fact that he does become wiser with a knowledge and experience. For instance, Odysseus, who is still the most powerful man in Ithaca, disguises himself as a beggar, the most debased position in the social hierarch, and receives manifold humiliating affronts. This example portrays how Odysseus has become extremely modest and thoughtful juxtaposed with him proudly yelling out his name to Polyphemus. However, even after the slaughter of the suitors, Odysseus might have caused another conflicts if Athene, the god of the war who loves Odysseus the most, didn't stop it.
“For all his failings, Gatsby is a far more admirable person than Tom or Daisy.” To what extent do you agree? Parading across the pages of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s definitive novel ‘The Great Gatsby” are an endless array of hedonistic, shallow and corrupt characters. In the character of Gatsby, the readers see a man who creates extravagant wealth on the back of illegal activities and who is complicit in lies and deception in order to reunite with his past love Daisy. However, despite failing to reach this grandiloquent dream, Gatsby is nonetheless “worth the whole damn bunch put together” and a mixture of sympathy and esteem are induced from the readers for his bravery, self control and determination. On the other hand, in the world Gatsby inhabits that is filled with the vacuous party goers, the cheating Jordan Baker, the shadowy villain Meyer Wolfsheim and the parasiite Kipspringer, the most detestable characters above all are the adulterant and violent Tom Buchannan and the shallow and indulged Daisy Buchanan.
It seems that in the metaphor rich nations are playing the role of King while poor nations become paupers that could contribute nothing but only wait for help. This metaphor is so unfair because it totally distorts the relationship and exaggerates the differences between rich nations and poor nations. As we know, in the modern society no single nation could survive without the premise of intercommunication and mutual benefit. Even for the wealthiest and strongest nation the United States, imports and foreign help are quite necessary. For
However, this “American Dream” led to more of a downfall of morals and a false sense of happiness. It created a new kind of person: a selfish, snobby, materialistic kind of person. Fitzgerald uses Tom Buchannan as a general representation of males in the 1920s. Generally, wealthy males were born into families with money, and didn’t work for it, and were brought up to have a certain air about them. Fitzgerald writes, “Now he [Tom] was a sturdy, straw haired man of thirty with a rather hard mouth and a supercilious manner.
That being said, Shakespeare has given each character their fair share of attributes that are certainly repugnant, and therefore only making the above statement partially true. The men of the story are all characterised as the leaders of their society who dominate the women in their lives. They are bigoted and manipulative in their own ways; however they still manage to maintain calm and measured exteriors. A prime example of this type of male in 'Othello' is Iago. Iago, to everyone else, seems like an honest and good man who will do everything in his power to help those around him succeed, but is really just power-hungry, two-faced and manipulative.
A working class citizen is no less respectable than a gentleman in Biddy’s eyes, it is the character of the person that truly matters. Estella, however, mocks Pip and scoffs at his “coarse hands” and “thick boots”, referring to him as a “common labouring-boy” Raised with the immense fortune of Miss Havisham, Estella has become pretentious, believing Pip to be a worse person because of his social standing. When you have everything given to you in life, you lose appreciation for those around you, becoming detached and cold, Estella tells Pip that in her heart there is “no softness there, no--sympathy--sentiment--nonsense” (238). This contrasts sharply with Biddy’s tender care and help of Pip, through her advice to him and her assistance in his educating himself. Magwitch came into a large fortune through hard work and perseverance, but instead of joining the elite upper echelon of society, he bestows the fortune of Pip,