I feel that once you use drugs in a work place you put other employees at risk. Employers do not need to ask about your prescription drugs, such as medication intake or cigarettes usage unless the quantity of your usage of a certain substances can interfere with your work duty. Employers do not even have the rights to request the list of your prescription medications, unless they are aware that you’re taken a particular dose that can harm others. The moral philosophy arguments are not an area we have historically put significant campaigning resources behind, primarily because other lines of argument - concerning impacts on public health and criminal justice. But it should be a concerned morally for someone to understand that if you’re taken what ever kind of drugs rather its prescription or Illegal, it can impact the way you think or the way you act towards your fellow employees.
If you do not have enough facts to make your case, explain what facts you would need to have in order to support a case of negligence. Your Answer: i. Duty: The duty of care requires the use of ordinary care to prevent injury to others and is determined on a case-by-case basis. In this case, the hotel has a duty to keeps its customer’s safe when they are in the hotel premises. The hotel owes a duty of due care to the person injured.
Identify the hazards-Firstly, identification of a hazard is needed and then work out on how people can be harmed by walking around the workplace and look at the things at your work place which has a possibility of harming people and how dangerously can people be harmed. Consult other workmates what they think and if they have noticed some hazards which you did not see. After finding the hazards then find how to control them so that people will not be harmed. In terms of machines and chemicals you have to check the manufacturer’s instructions so that you may know how to use them. 2.
This policy was the exact opposite of his license obligations that stated he was to report any crimes and felonies he saw. The policy forced David to into a moral dilemma where he had to choose whether to abide by Blue Mountain’s rules or to obey the police unit’s rules. As an employee David had a moral obligation to his company as well as to the other stakeholders. David`s had a responsibility to be loyal to his company as well as to keep the other stakeholders safe. In this situation the policy was unethical because it risked the safety of all other stakeholders and enabled criminal
It is important that information is only shared with people “who need to know”. If you are uncertain whether a person has a right to access information and is requesting information from you, always check with your supervisor or manager. In day to day communication it is strict policy of midstream that you do not discuss any important information about a clients lifestyle or regarding important information as this is their right to remain any of this information confidential and is part of the regulations of The Human Rights Act 1998. Information that has to be kept confidential on a day to day basis can be shared with agreed others on any other basis as a need to know basis, this is if ever an authoritative body needs to get involved such as social services, ambulance, police or any other multi-agency network. The agreed others in which confidential information can be shared on a need to know basis are: Work Colleagues, social workers, occupational therapist, GP, Speech and Language Therapist, Physiotherapist, pharmacist, nurse, special nurse, psychologist, psychiatrist, advocate, dementia care advisor or family and carers.
For instance as alcoholism can be a major problem at work, some companies provide someone as an advocate and counsel. These counselors can work with them to modify behavior and reduce alcohol related incidents and further harm to their self on the job and in their personal life. That is something prohibition policies cannot do for an individual person. The proponents of zero tolerance see the alcoholic epidemic as a disease and therefore cannot allow continued usage if the person is to be treated and recover. It is not looked at as merely a social or health issue.
How does duty of care affect your own role? You must be able to carry out duties that you are competent to do so. It is your duty to inform your line manager and decline the work that you have not been trained for here are two examples below You have had manual handling training to use a hoist there for you can use it safely and properly. You have not had training to use ceiling hoist, you cannot use it as if you did it would be unsafe and could cause an accident. You must be accountable for keeping records safe, reporting problems, and for your own decisions.
Control of substance hazardous to health 2002 In the care sector these regulations may apply to cleaning materials and medications that may be dangerous if not used properly. Care providers must protect staff and service users from harm by ensuring that potentially dangerous substances are safely stored and that staff that use them are properly trained to do so. Reporting of injuries, diseases and dangerous occurrences regulations 1995 Employers, the self-employed and ‘responsible persons’ (people in control of work premises) have an obligation to report death or serious workplace accidents, occupational diseases and specified dangerous occurrences (near misses) to the HSE. Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981 Employers must ensure that first aid equipment and trained first-aiders are present in the workplace and that
I can mention some law tort committed by the other person: breach of an agreement, if someone injures, loss of property or any relationships that were caused by the act of someone from the other side. To avoid any fees for legal protection, especially what they should require all businesses need to have a basic knowledge about torts. It will be best for them since they can recognize and reduce risks where the most effective position of your business. Negligence: If a person does something irresponsible and will behave without character and he will be indifferent to everything, if you say one word it's a bad person and do not appreciate anything and then obviously guilty of negligence. To cite just a traffic accident: If the driver was going too fast as it was designed in a particular lane and not adapt their driving according to brand and then the resulting court is likely to determine the driver's negligence as a criminal offense.
Everyone related to this company is affected by this situation. Investigators and employees didn’t want to get involves because they didn’t want to investigate their own bosses or be involve in conflicts of interest. I think their claims were reasonable but don’t think action should be taken upon them. But to prevent this issue there should be a policy or clause addressing this issue with its consequences so it doesn’t happen again. 3.