While the current liability dropped from 25.6% in 2003 to 24.3% in 2004, it is apparent that this company has allocated for this as a long-term debt since it rose from 23% of total liabilities in 2003 to 26.4% in 2004. Lucent Technologies equity structure enhanced from a shortage representing a negative in their total liabilities and shareholder’s equity in the year of 2003 when it is compared to the year of 2004. Their equity position would be considered a deficit, but becomes less of an issue as the years pass. Lucent Technologies Case P.3 3. What concerns would investors and creditors have based on only this information?
Even though the acid-test ratio is less than 1 which rates in the lower third quartile in the industry of 1.6, 0.9 to 0.6, it indicates a concern with repaying current liabilities. This could be due to quick expansion of inventory with the intention of increasing sales. While this is currently considered a weakness and is concerning, a rise in the ratio should be seen by 2013 due to the increase of suggested sales. 3. I calculated an “inventory turnover ratio” which measures the number of times a company sells its inventory during a year.
Causes Analysis: As to external issues, there are mainly three reasons causing overall industry downturn. Firstly, the nightmare of 9/11 deeply stroke customers’ confidence in traveling, leading to a drastic price cut. Secondly, many uncertainties, such as geographical climate, terrorism, terrifying virus, and increasing fuel prices, also gives great pressure to this industry. Thirdly, a fierce competition among three biggest players also gave great buyers’ power. The industry wide capacity is growing much faster than the demand growth.
1. Assessment of changes in Coke’s financial statements between 1996-2010. Coke has done well from 1996 to 2010 based on the financial statements reviewed. The company has grown revenue significantly while still controlling the cost of goods and assets. The overall costs of assets required for operating expenses has reduced as a percent of revenue.
The first thing an analyst may look at is Kodak’s sales and operating costs. Kodak income statement shows an increase in sales since 2002 and its operating costs show about a 15 percent increase between 2002 and 2003. Looking at this point of Kodak’s income statement an analyst may consider Kodak to be somewhat profitable but because of Kodak’s increase in operating cost an analyst would dig deeper as to what was the cause of Kodak’s operating cost increase. The increase in operating cost between 2002 and 2003 seems rather large considering Kodak only increased its sales by almost 3 percent. Taking a further look, an analyst might have some concerns when looking over Kodak’s account payables and liabilities.
Continue to look into the “Andy Defresne” marketing program responsible for the variation. e) Per the Inventory Manger, the increase in inventory is due to a combination of happenings throughout the year. $5,000,000 of the increase is attributable to a decrease in sales and a higher turnover rate. $11,000,000 of the increase in inventory is due to the purchase of materials from suppliers to receive a cheaper rate for the long haul. $3,000,000 of the inventory happened secondary to a reversal of a previous write down, which was incurred in 2002.
The stock valuation model, P0 = D1/ (i - g), can be used for firms which have negative growth rates. 4. Company J and Company K each recently reported the same earnings per share (EPS). Company J’s stock, however, trades at a higher price. Which of the following statements is most correct?
2. What assumptions can you use to arrive approximately at the share price of $55,400 that was estimated by Kohler Co.? Show how these assumptions impact your valuation. 3. What assumptions can you use to arrive approximately at the share price of $273,000 that was estimated by the dissenting shareholders?
From 1974-1978 all the major firms saw increased sales and net income but as time progresses and the market stops growing the firms that have best positioned themselves will begin to dominate the competition. An indicator firm success can be found in looking at firm Return On Sales (ROS). ROS = Net Income/Sales Revenue, it is a measure of firm efficiency and firms with higher ROS are demonstrating an ability to control costs and/or charge a higher price for their product(s) as opposed to competition. Lower ROS firms have lower income in relation to revenue and increasing net income is harder. In 1978 Emerson (Beaird-Poulan) and Electrolux (Husqvarna) are the industry leaders in ROS at 7.9%.
So, Dividend Yield is 0% for 2002 and 2003. The increase in Earnings per share from $0.49 in 2002 to $0.61 in 2003 evidence of the growth potential of the company. Company’s asset has also grown in 2003. This indicates that Krispy Kreme’s stock is a “Growth Stock” and explains why it has not paid any dividend. “We intend to retain our earnings to finance the expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future……Dividend Payments are restricted by our bank credit facilities to 50% of our net income for the immediately preceding fiscal year.”i Cash Flow Statement Analysis: Krispy Kreme uses the Indirect Method of reporting Operating Cash Flows.