Knock And Rsquo Case Study

458 Words2 Pages
Portfolio Project #3 No suppression for ‘no knock’ search Hudson was upset because he felt the entry of his home was unlawful and a violation of the knock-and-announce rule. Hudson argued that, police will now feel that they can skip past the knock-and-announce rule with no exclusionary rule sanction. Hudson brought forth that there were a few published decisions to date that announced big damage awards for numerous knock-and-announce violations. Hudson felt there wasn’t a difference in his case. Antonin Scalia noted that the “knock-and-announce” rule is constitutionally mandated. She also argued the under that rule, it’s not easily determined how long the police have to
Open Document