King Lear And Tuesdays With Morrie Comparativ Essa

1603 Words7 Pages
In the bible, Matthew 6:24 tells us that, "No man can serve two masters." The truth of this maxim is demonstrated well in William Shakespeare's King Lear. In King Lear, There were moral questions involving divided loyalties. Some try to be truly loyal to one master, some try to be loyal to more than one master, and others just project loyalty while remaining true only to themselves. In King Lear loyalty is measured primarily in the personal. In both novels King Lear by William Shakespeare and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the protagonists (King Lear and Morrie Schwartz) were able to achieve wisdom and knowledge despite all the misfortune and hardship they both experienced in their lifetime. You can say that King Lear and Morrie started both their stories as totally diverse people. Morrie in “Tuesdays with Morrie” would always accentuate the value of love, family and passion. As for King Lear, those attributes just happen to be part of life and didn’t not have much affection or be keen on family values. Morrie was very dissatisfied on how society was operated and controlled, but for King Lear, he showed carelessness and was consented on how society was ran. Morrie’s outlook on death is that it is a total natural cause that no one can avoid. We lose everything that we own when we are dead and there nothing we can do about it. That it is a simple part of life. As for King Lear he wanted to live like a king regardless of dividing his land between his daughters. He still felt that he should be king of all the lands, but does not want to carry the responsibilities of taking care of them, leaving the daughters to do all the hard work. In spite of having different personalities, values and beliefs both King Lear and Morrie achieve real and authentic wisdom by experiencing the values of life, perspective on life and they both experience pathetic fallacy. Both King

More about King Lear And Tuesdays With Morrie Comparativ Essa

Open Document