He tries to prove how animal testing affects animals, but the evidence that he gives us was some kind of violence and lacking police protection. These evidences do not match with the idea that he tells us that “lacking adequate police protection, fearing for the lives of their employees… bringing it to the brink of bankruptcy”. I feel that the writer uses red herring. He keeps bring up criminal issue instead of talking about how animal testing effects on animals. Moreover, the writer gives evidence that I feel it does not make sense “the crime against Huntington are not isolated incidents; animal rights terrorists commit more than 1,000 crimes annually”.
If you saw a Pit Bull being walked by its owner at your local park, how would you react? Would you cringe at the thought of the monstrous thing and stay out of its way, or would you be compelled to ask if you may pet this wonderful, misunderstood creature? The general public would be afraid of the dog. However, the properly educated portion of the human race knows better than to conform to popular belief and succumb to the mass hysteria regarding this breed without first doing research of their own. Most people shudder at the thought or sight of a Pit Bull and consider them vicious atrocities, but I will show that Pit Bulls are innocent and really are just misunderstood.
In the article “This must never happen again” by Cathy Martin, Coldstream in The Age, published on June 9th 2011, she is telling the reader that only humans are only dominant enough to declare themselves owner of all other animals, which leads them with a huge role of responsibility. Cathy Martin would rather see meat prices go up instead of seeing the animals get hurt and harmed like they did shown on Four Corners. I would have to agree with this because it is wrong in so many ways with was done to the cattle. I would also feel sympathy for the 1200 peoples’ lives and jobs depend on the live export trade but maybe the ones that are to lose their jobs could help form a new authority to oversee the strict new standards relating to the future slaughter of Australian animals. The last argument supported in this issue is the use of the restraining boxes; a restraining box is used to restrain animals and to “stun” them quickly and accurately before slaughter- and in which a ‘stun gun’ is to render the animal unconscious.
We rarely think completely about where the food we eat comes from and how is it produced. "Food, Inc.", a frank and sometimes grisly expose of the profit-driven food profession in the United States, is sure to shake up our views of what we eat. Factory system was conveyed to the back of the kitchen, after which food began to be formed on assembly lines. From the film, we can see that health and safety are frequently ignored by those companies, and are often overlooked by government in an struggle to provide cheap food heedlessly of these bad penalties. According to data, 70% of antibiotics are used on farm animals.
Are Pit Bulls Really too Dangerous? “BSL is nothing more than breed profiling and as of yet it has not worked to curb the amount of serious dog attacks it was put in place to stop” (www.pitbulllovers.com, 2007). Breed Specific Legislation, or BSL are a set of laws that restricts breeds of dog or completely bans the breed from an area. BSL has banned the American Pit Bull Terrier from multiple states in America, and even some European countries. In this essay I will prove the unnecessity of BSL.
It may not do any harm, but on the other hand, it may.” This shows the dangerous factor of the food. This can relate back to Frankenstein, for he doesn’t want to create another monster because of the harm it could do or not do. He doesn’t want to take that chance of a mistake again. This relates back to the theme of the dangerous curiosity if knowledge. In the second article, Fox News states that they wont know the effect it will have on the animals and society, “…many individuals have qualms about
The bad part is that both the meat packaging companies and immigration knew that this people were illegals, but they still kept hiring them and letting them work for a while in there companies. They kept capturing and deporting immigrant from this companies, so that the government wouldn’t suspect that they were hiring illegal immigrants and that they were following
Carson starts by presenting a fact to her audience about people mainly farmers killing animals intentionally instead of unintentionally to keep them from being a pestilence to their fields. She then goes on to state her central argument in the passage, which is that people should stop using the poisons to “control concentrations of birds distasteful to farmers” because by doing this their harming innocent animals who “may have roamed those bottomlands and perhaps never visited the farmers’ cornfields” but were “doomed” to die because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Carson uses rhetorical questions in her passage to make her argument stronger. The use of the rhetorical questions not only gets to her readers emotionally but mentally. “Who has decided-who has the right to decide…” she is referring to the poison being used.
We will not make them suffer long painful deaths. Ethical treatment of animals can be solved using the deontology theory. “Deontology focuses on what we are obligated to do as rational moral agents. It is particularly important to see that the deontologist does not say that actions do not have consequences; rather, the deontologist insists that actions should not be evaluated on the basis of the action's consequences (Mossler, 2010).“ One example of the deontology theory in action is your livestock is being attacked by a wild animal. In efforts to protect your livestock you shoot and kill the wild animal.
Outsourcing the cooking activity can hamper the quality of foods as the management department of the restaurant will not have any control over the quality of foods. Thus it can lose its customers. Buffalo Wild Wings is popular for the unique taste of the wings. Due to outsourcing of cooking it can lose the secret of that unique taste and thus can lose competitive