Roger believed that you developed conditions of worth (e.g. worthlessness and low self-esteem) due to the lack of positive regard from your parents as a child. An example of a parent setting conditions of worth on their children would be praising your child if it behaves in a way that is considered socially acceptable. 4) Explain two limitations of the Humanist approach in psychology (4 Marks) Humanistic theories are hard to falsify, they lack predictive power and are therefore unscientific – in rejecting the scientific method, Humanists theories lack imperial evidence and can be seen as bias. Another limitation of this approach is that Individual emotions and consciousness are difficult to study objectively as psychologists ask the patient how their
This method is wrong because it had bad consequences. Parents can use the correct method of education when the child baby. Many parents never learned from their own childhood that there are positive ways of relating to children. For example when punishment does not accomplish the desired goals, and if the parent is unaware of alternative methods, punishment can escalate to more frequent and dangerous actions against the child. Parents believe that beating is a means of discipline and kind of education.
When taking the simpler route, the individual does not show persistence because they want to easily pursue their desire. Risk taking involves being a bit reckless and dangerous with no regard of being cautious. Since people with low self-control they only think of themselves primarily, being insensitive to others, they may be short tempered and handle situations with little ability to communicate verbally. I had a positive guardianship growing up in my household. If both my sister and I were out of “control” according to my mother, she would not hesitate to spank us, which is now looked down upon in today’s society.
The question really is why the parents would be held responsible for the crimes or actions of their children. People who disagree with me will say that since the parents are responsible for the child that they are responsible for the child’s actions. What I say to that is, parents should not be held responsible for their children’s actions and/or crimes because the parents cannot control every decision of their minor children. A parent can teach a child to do the right thing but that does not mean the child will always do the right thing. A parent cannot control everything that their child does.
But I must say that parents are a huge and irreplaceable difference in the lives of children in terms of education, abuse, physical and mental health, drug use, pregnancy and nearly every other social indicator. Despite this, I do not think that prisons are a type of replacement for parents. Persons who do not learn to develop at home can hardly develop in jail. For single parents maybe the raising of the kids is not perhaps as with both parents, but education has the same purpose. Prisons can never give the same education or love from a single parent home.
Also including my personal observation on children in my own family. I want to persuade you on how dangerous it is to spoil our children and what we can do to prevent them from becoming “little brats”. Kids these days are more self-centered and their individuality appears at a young age, due to the lack of control by parents. And now you find them having privileges that till this day we don’t have access to, such as: expensive cell phones and top of the range laptops as well as having their own driver by the age of 7. I won’t go deep into physical details such as the harm on the eyesight and brain; I would simply be talking about the behavior of children today.
Because we are only human, we tend to make mistakes more often than not, and because we make those mistakes, it is hardly impossible to argue that humans are good. From a very young age, our parents work hard to teach us to share our toys and to play nice with our peers, but what some don’t realize is that if our parents weren’t around to teach us that, we would never learn, and eventually grow up to be unapologetically bad. This is because it is part of human nature to keep the best for ourselves, and to keep others away from what we feel is ours. Humans are not born with the ability to want to automatically share what is theirs, and this only adds to my point of view that much more. Cabrales 2 The only reason that the world is able to function correctly, the way it has for an extremely long time, is because of the laws that have come to surface in order to keep us in line.
Furthermore I will prove that this system is not efficient and can lead to further problems as children mature in age. My first premise is that physical rewards such as sweets, money and prizes do not alter a child’s behaviour. When used, the reward system only lasts for a short period of time until the child stops receiving these rewards (Grille, N.D). This is because when children are bribed with rewards for good behaviour, they soon learn how to manipulate adults so that they receive rewards in return (Grille, N.D). “On the other hand children also begin to believe that when they receive a reward for stopping an unacceptable behaviour, they should be given something when they treat people with respect” (Hall, 2009).
In case, the student does not obey my instruction, positive punishment, which is the application of an unfavorable stimulus after an undesirable behavior in order to decreases that response, is a very useful method and the result can be shown shortly. For example, if the students are not obey my words I would like to tell their parents and let their parents to reprimand them afterwards or I would just castigate them at that time by myself. Although the students will become dutiful in a short time, they may afraid of me after that and do not want to have a lesson again. It is no doubt that positive punishment is an effective way for punishing students and it can achieve the result in a short time, however, this is not the best way to punish the students. It is because this may not only lead to a damaged relationship between teachers and students, but also can lead to negative associations.
The relationship between Family influence and peer influence is that it influences people in the way that they are interacting with each other. There no way to prevent a child from getting peer influence. According to Sally Burgess Brian Burgess, “you need to prepare them by telling them the kind of temptation there are likely to face in life.” Even though children have better relationship with their peer you could still preparing them by encouraging them to make good decisions in life, so you could gain their trust and respect. Mostly Peer influence harms you in society for example, smoking, drinking, drugs, fighting and revealing against society. To make peer influence harmless you just need to teach your child to say no.