Juvenile Risk Assessment

1871 Words8 Pages
Risk Assessment An important and critical development in the juvenile justice system over the last few decades is the implementation of the assessment tools to classify youth by their risk to re-offend (Chambers, 2009). Research has shown that juvenile offenders are more likely to return to the justice system the more they are in contact with the system; therefore, interventions need to be different depending upon whether youth are classified as low, medium or high risk. Furthermore, indicates keeping lower-risk youth out of detention, and results in lower incidence of crime. In the following risk assessment paper, two juvenile offender’s cases have been computed using both the Missouri, and Washington Risk Assessment models. This paper…show more content…
Research has shown that juvenile offenders are more apt [Passive voice] to return to the justice system the more they are in contact with the system; therefore, interventions need to be different depending upon whether youth are classified [Passive voice] as low, medium or high risk. Furthermore, indicates keeping lower-risk youth out of detention and results in lower incidence of crime. The incomplete information was advised in the Missouri and Washington State prior assessments above for each individual. Each state’s classification system incorporates a matrix that is designed [Passive voice] to match the sanction with the level of control necessary to manage the risk (Missouri Juvenile Offender Risk Assessment, 2003). The purpose of the classification matrix is to suggest the presumptive sanction(s) for youth entering the juvenile justice system based on the seriousness of the present offense and the risk of continued delinquent behavior. Furthermore because of incomplete information in criminal history, social behavior, attitude behavior indicators, incomplete school data, medical history, and families background along with criminal history, this is assessment cannot properly assess these two juveniles. Additionally, the assessment cannot match the sanction with the level of control necessary to manage the risk, and offer the advantages of the matrix approach for a more accurate measure of recidivism than the use of a risk assessment only (Missouri Juvenile Offender Risk Assessment, 2003). In assessing the current information with an understanding the risk assessment is incomplete and pending further investigations the correctional strategy are assessed
Open Document