Rhetorical Analysis Essay The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger is written for a teenage and young adult audience. The reader knows this statement is true because throughout the book Holden had some things that the wrong audience would not like or be able to relate. One would say that because Holden is a minor he should not be making lots of important decisions that would affect him later. This does not mean only teenagers would like this book but it does mean that teens can relate to Holden the best.
A very good example of this is his date Sally who is roughly around the same age as him and thinks things through and is aware of the consequences. The catcher in the Rye should not be banned. The book simply is about struggle and mistakes that other people can learn from. Although some of the contents may be harsh there is always a reason behind Holden’s motives. One important way to see this book is as an expression of a teenage boy.
She realises that the knowledge she has is something to be grateful for (although at his stage she is not willing to pursue it) and she accepts that there is something positive about Anys. This leads on to a second point. 2. Anys has pride but pride in the positive sense - she has self-pride. Even as a child she was self-possessed (see p52f) which the shy Anna finds admirable.
When Sam got into certain situations he remembered what Reggie taught him while taking Kung-Fu lessons, Sam was taught how to mediate. Mediation was very helpful when things are not going right in your life you can clear all the negativity out of your mind and concentrate better on how to reach your goal which is what Sam did. Sam states, “But Carla could be tough, and she wasn’t the least bit intimidated by three teenage boys who sometimes resented being pushed so hard”(124). It’s very important for young kids to have positive influences in their life, because they can sometimes drift off into the bad elements of life with the existence of peer pressure its very easy, but when mentors are in place its easier for the kids to get back on track, because the seed has been planted. Having mentors in Sam’s life helped reinforced what he had realized, he didn’t want to be a statistic in
From this, the morally sound character, Stan, tells the audience that stereotyping people is wrong, but it is also good to be cautious of certain things. This doesn’t just appeal to one argument; it takes both viewpoints and acknowledges each one as if both are equally important. This kind of show plays a big impact on our lives because it teaches us how to be a better person. I myself have learned much from South Park, and each time a reminder is needed I just look back and have myself a nice laugh or
If the senior officer is corrupt the likelihood of sanction is negligible, then the young officer will accept the status quo and become corrupt. Finally, the slippery slope perspective proposes that the acceptance of minor gratuities begins a process wherein the recipient’s integrity is gradually subverted and eventually leads to more serious unethical conduct. Sherman (1985) observed that novice police officers quickly recognize the importance of the social bonds between members of the department. Some young officers may initially rationalize that the acceptance of minor gratuities (e.g., free coffee or half-priced meals) is necessary for acceptance
Final Product #2 By banning books, it creates a negative effect on kids and adults and possibly even eliminate the teachings of life lessons for students. Going through life without the knowledge of what else is out there besides “good” in people can be harsh for some people especially for kids. Kids would not be able to handle life too well in the real world, if the whole time when they were younger they were being protected from all the "bad things" and “bad people.” Many people decide to do what they think is best for the safety of children, but in reality when kids grow up to be adults sometimes it harms them in more ways than helping them. Books shouldn't be banned from society, but some books do have suggestive content or profanity. When the so-called “negative parts” of the books remain, kids gain knowledge of what is and what is not good to do, say, or act.
The first thing that I would change would be to enforce harsher punishment for crimes so as to defer young teens from making the same mistakes again. Now-a-days a young person can commit a crime, and get a small punishment from the juvenile system and be out the next day. They eventually learn that if they keep committing these crimes, then they will keep being able to get away with it with only a small punishment. Kids these days are not stupid, they will eventually catch on to the fact that they are not being punished nearly as harsh as they should be and that alone will tell them that they should just keep doing it. I think one of the main reasons that they do
It will automatically decrease crime rates in today’s society and hopefully make it a better place. When harsh punishments are involved for adolescents and teens who commit crimes, many will learn from the mistakes they have made and discourage others from doing such. By 17, a child is no longer considered a child and could certainly be considered an adult. There are many pros and cons on the issue of juveniles being tried as adults, as is evidently seen on television and the internet these days. Each of the issues is beneficial and argued about.
Education, work skills, treating others with respect, and self-discipline is stressed. Younger criminals who have committed fewer and less severe crimes are most likely to be successfully reformed. Another positive way to cut down recidivism is to begin with parents educating their kids on positive behavior. Parents must be an example for their children and model positive behaviors. Unfortunately, some parents are poor examples for their children and show their children bad behavior through example like gang and criminal activities.