Jury Nullification Essay

1299 Words6 Pages
Jury Nullification Race-based jury nullification is a controversial issue. Statistics show both sides to the issue and how this can affect the outcome of a jury’s verdict. A jury bases the verdict on different aspect of a trial, such as race. The question remains if jurors have the right to use jury nullification to acquit based on race and to what degree the jury taking the law into his or her own hands. Also in question if jury nullification challenges the statute of the law when making a decision to acquit the defendant on how the jury feels fit on the punishment of the defendant and the law. Past criminal trials have made headlines and the jury’s verdict in question. This allows society to lose faith in the criminal justice system and affect future trials. Jury nullification decides the fate of a defendant and questioning if the jury-based the decision on race should not be an issue. For race-based jury nullification Race-based nullification is not promoted as a positive thing all the time but evening out races throughout a jury may influence the verdict. Racial nullification prohibits the law to protect the plaintiff, if the weight is on evidence (Tomlinson, 2010). Jury nullification is the refusal of jurors to convict a defendant despite his or her belief in the defendant’s guilt and believe the law is unjust the jury, is said to judge the law though more accurately, the jury is judging the law’s specific applications and not the general validity. An example of a race-based jury is White jurors acquit White defendant despite the evidence of guilt. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits discrimination based on race or ethnicity while selecting jury members and among this clause the Constitutional right to a fair trial stands strong (Cornell University Law School, 2010). Although the Equal Protection Clause cannot force

More about Jury Nullification Essay

Open Document