The idea that unequal treatment and social mistreatment are still constant struggles is addressed in Angelina Price’s essay “Working Class Whites” and bell hooks’ essay “Eating the Other: Desire and Resistance. Both authors explain how racial and social controversy affects today’s society. This is done through Price narrowing her focus on how class structure and media relations affects this issue while hooks’ essay concentrates more on public perception with relation to this issue. Both authors use a significant amount of evidence to support their logic as well as ideas that allow the reader to draw their own personal conclusions. In both essays, the idea of social class fueling thoughts and perceptions of either the “Other” or “poor white class” in today’s society is drawn upon multiple times.
If the only reason to pull someone over depends on his or her race, this causes a discriminatory impact. Police departments begun to review data on stops and change police officers behaviors, arguments and attitudes towards the leading of stereotype based discriminatory treatment. (Racial profiling, 2012) This researcher frowns much upon racial profiling but with surveys conducted every day on who is likely to commit a crime, and what age, and what sex, and what minority group then people tend to lean towards these surveys proving that race is a huge part of crime involvement. In conclusion, criminal profiling works as an investigative tool to help solve crimes. Criminal profiling has come a long way and still needs a lot of improvement.
This way, the jury would allow the defendant to go free based on the fact of race to prove a point to the criminal justice system that they need to stop going after minorities. We will review ethnicity based jury nullification in this paper. Race has always played a part in the judicial system for years. In our society today, ethnicity still influences the system, through courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. In the United States there are mixed areas all over, which include poverty stricken areas as well as wealthier areas.
To what extent is it true to say that high levels of criminality amongst ethnic minorities are a real visible phenomenon? Official statistics on the criminal justice process show some striking differences between ethnic groups. For example, black people are more likely to be imprisoned than other groups. Is this because some ethnic groups are more likely to offend in the first place, or is it because the criminal justice system is racist and discriminates against ethnic minorities. According to official statistics, there are some significant ethnic differences in the likelihood of being involved in the criminal justice system.
The consequence of these roles and stereotypes has resulted in their disproportional presence as offenders. In which the incarceration rates for Black women are and have always been higher than her proportion to the general population (Lewis, 1981, p. 93 & Russell-Brown, 2004 p. 125). French (1978, p. 333) further elaborated, “The female population had a higher proportion of Blacks than did the male populations.” Historically, and still in some ways the criminal justice system has been biased against African Americans. Furthermore, it has been noted that women are often treated differently within the criminal justice system. Lastly, it has been well documented within the oppression framework that the law is biased against the lower class.
Judicial decisions have also effectively created new crime as in Shaw v. DPP (1962) – offence of conspiracy to corrupt public morals, or R v. R (1991) – rape within marriage is a crime. Also, in contract and tort law, nearly all the main rules come from cases decided by judges. Many of them were made in the last century or so but still affect today law e.g. Felthouse v. Bindley (1863) – silence can not be deemed as consent (acceptance of an offer) or the neighbourhood principles produced in Donoughue v. Stevenson (1932). So how can judge create law through the doctrine of precedent?
Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the value of the ‘chivalry thesis’ in understanding gender differences in crime. When looking at official statistics it is clear to see that there is a difference in the amount and type of crime that is committed by the two sexes. The chivalry thesis is the idea that the cause for this difference is the experience of women within the criminal justice system (CJS). The thesis argues that women are treated more leniently by criminal justice agents such as the police , magistrates and judges because men are socialised to behave in a ‘chivalrous’ way towards women. There are several differences in the amount of crime that men and women do.
This essay will consider at the various advantages and disadvantages of the Jury within the context of the legal system. It will start by highlighting the role of the jury in a trial, of whom they are comprised, and how the system works. It will then go on to analyse on the advantages and disadvantages of the system, including illustrative evidence both supporting and opposing the jury system. Following this there will be a short summary, highlighting the main points of this essay and then a conclusion. A jury can be defined as a group of people (usually 12 in number) who have been selected to consider the issues of fact in a trail in a Court of Law, in order to make a finding as to an individual’s guilt or lack thereof to a standard which is either “beyond reasonable doubt” or “on the balance of probabilities”.
Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated. Another issue that was discussed is the inequality of death penalty in practice. There have been serious issues with racial discrimination. For reference in cases with white victims and black defendants convictions occurred twenty two percent of the time while with black victims and white defendants with percentage dropped to a measly three
The relationship between race and crime has been an ongoing situation and it mainly deals with incarceration among minorities. There has been little work as far as public perception goes because as of right now it is perceived that minorities believe in the rule of the law and they believe that the justice system is biased and unfair with the way that they handle sentencing. There has been a lot of focus both criminal and noncriminal punishments and how they have both been neglected. It still hasn’t been determined if race remains the salient for the demographic variable for discrimination. There were a hundreds of females that were talked to in finding out there perception of criminal punishment.