Jury Nullification Essay

1617 Words7 Pages
Jury Nullification Paper The jury’s repudiation to sentence a person even through the presence of a resilient proof which supports guilt is called jury nullification. With regards to handling cases, the jury shouldn’t develop sympathy for it will result to jury nullification. During the trial, sentencing or verdict should always be based on the facts and shouldn’t even concern an individual’s race at all. At an instance wherein the jury couldn’t come up with a conviction due to the fact that race is involved, it is called as race-based nullification which is evidently not good for a murderer can be set free as this occurs. Thus, as this happens, it would be right for punishment as this is believed to wrong. In the United State’s Court Systems, the conventional method is for jurors as “evaluator of fact” and judges as the interpreter of the law and the instructor of the jury with regards to the application of the law. In an instance wherein the jury replaces its personal interpretation of the law and ignores the law fully to come up with a verdict, this results to jury nullification. In the courts, the commonly established perception of jury nullification is when a juror acknowledges power but has no right to nullify the law. Jury nullification is frequently practiced, but rarely occurs, in criminal trials and theoretically applicable to civil trials too – where it is focus to civil procedural solutions. To spare the innocent and castigate the guilty was the premeditated goal of the criminal justice system. An effect of a race-based jury nullification could be the demising an innocent life or incarcerating an innocent individual (Duane, 1996). Studies reveal that there’s an estimate of three to four percent of jury criminal trials engaged in jury nullification. Sad to say that there’s no means of totally eradicating jury nullification for jurors can’t be controlled

More about Jury Nullification Essay

Open Document