June 2004 Essay

2389 Words10 Pages
Subject: Chains, Rings and Spectroscopy Session: June Year: 2004 Code: 2814 Final Mark Scheme MAXIMUM MARK 90 ADVICE TO EXAMINERS ON THE ANNOTATION OF SCRIPTS 1. Please ensure that you use the final version of the Mark Scheme. You are advised to destroy all draft versions. 2. Please mark all post-standardisation scripts in red ink. A tick ( ) should be used for each answer judged worthy of a mark. Ticks should be placed as close as possible to the point in the answer where the mark has been awarded. The number of ticks should be the same as the number of marks awarded. If two (or more) responses are required for one mark, use only one tick. Half marks should never be used. 3. The following annotations may be used in when marking. No comments should be written on scripts unless they relate directly to the mark scheme. Remember that scripts may be returned to centres. = = = = = = incorrect response (errors may also be underlined) omission of the correct response “benefit of the doubt” (where professional judgement has been used in deciding a response is worthy of a mark) “error carried forward” (in consequential marking) contradiction (in cases where candidates contradict themselves in the same response). No mark awarded, even if one response was correct. 1 error in the number of significant figures (only penalised once on the paper). ^ bod ecf con sf 4. The marks awarded for each part question should be indicated in the margin provided on the right hand side of the page. The mark total for each question should be ringed at the end of the question, on the right hand side. These totals should be added up to give the final total on the front of the paper. 5. In cases where candidates are required to give a specific number of answers, (e.g. ‘give three reasons …’), mark the first answer(s) given up to the total number required. Strike through the

More about June 2004 Essay

Open Document