Throughout his entire life, he had a very charismatic personality. This helped him to succeed in inspiring and motivating his men. Having the respect of his soldiers helped him to become a favourable political leader that people were able to look up to and admire.In addition, Alexander was a very strategic individual. It was due to this that he managed to create many effective military positions. This played a big role in his many victories, as he was able to win battles against the other leaders who did not have equally adequate positions.
Napoleon was also a strong leader because he thought of his people; he made a new program of public works that employed many. Rebuilt the roads so his armies could move quickly and to stimulate the economy, he built new harbors and canals and filled museums with art and built new schools and universities. Napoleons victories began to go into a downward spiral. I believe at the end of napoleons rule he was not a strong leader. Although he had many accomplishments that did not make up for the fact that his confidence was rising and the failures that came along with it.
In conclusion, Napoleon Bonaparte is considered a hero that save many lives through many decisions that he made. These decisions include the religious tolerance and allowing the enemy of the French Revolution to regain their power over with the government. In addition to the religious tolerance, Napoleon expanded his country to gain more land and power. On the other hand, he paired his siblings to allow surrounding countries to have an alliance with France. All in all, Napoleon is a hero that preserved many ideas of the French Revolution and his
Which was a combination of Greek and traditional cultures. He did this by building many of his cities with the name Alexandria. Intermarriage within the conquered peoples as well as philosophy, literature, art and history made a huge impact on the eastern world and the Greeks. At the age of thirty- three Alexander the Great was one of the most successful generals in history. He was able to obtain victory with skillful tactics, flexibility, a keen sense of logistics, and superior leadership.
Was Augustus a consummate politician? In the eyes of the average Roman citizen, Augustus was a consummate politician and excellent administrator. He achieved this reputation through his manipulative propaganda and administrative changes that benefited the people of Rome, such as his political and social reforms. However, Augustus faced opposition from both outside and within the family, including threats from Cornelius Gallus and his daughter Julia, which gives evidence of defective aspects of his principate and flaws in his administration. However, while Augustus was not consummate, he is still considered by many as Rome's greatest emperor.
Leadership Style Paper George Smith Patton Jr. George Patton led his troops to victory in North Africa, Sicily, and on the Western Front. He was admired by many followers and feared by his enemies. These victories led him to become one of the most memorable and historical leaders in American history (The New York Times, 2010). George Patton had many traits that added to his success as a leader, he was self-confident he had ambition and poise, and orderly thinking. All these types of traits can be found in other successful leaders throughout history.
Alexander the Great Alexander III was considered a great because of his actions and many different accomplishments. As the King of Macedonia he did many great things. He attempted to conquer the entire world. He would have done it too but he had a quick unfortunate death. After his death the downfall of the empire he was building for 10 years fell.
Who is the noblest Roman of them all you ask? Well in my opinion I think it is the all mighty Caesar. Caesar is well known around by everyone, I’m pretty sure if you brought is name up in a conversation the other person would have some idea of who you’re talking about. He was known to be a very strong mighty warrior that everyone in the kingdom feared. A lot of people despise him but not just because he was cruel but because he was ruler of all of them in Rome.
This is an example of how Louis so strictly controlled his nobles, many called Versailles a “gilded cage,” because of how the nobles were so enclosed in such a beautiful place. Many of the taxes from the commoners went directly to the construction and well-keeping of versailles, this obviously upset the citizens in the town. Despite Louis’ strange requests and poor control of the economy, he was an excellent war strategist. Much of the other money he gained from the citizens he used to design weapons and create an unstoppable army. By the end, the numbers in his army sky-rocketed from 180,000 troops, to 450,000, proving that Louis XIV was a very successful war leader.
His tactics and knowledge have had outstanding impact on the world more so the military forces of the world that has led many of them to apply his tactics in modern warfare tactics. Some of his tactical approaches played a key role in the First World War. Among what Alexander the great employed in his forces was discipline. Up to this day, many leaderships employee discipline in their forces such as preventing looting in areas they operate. Alexander the Great had a successful reign and his campaign will forever have an impact in the military forces in the