Surely, gender is not the main factor to decide that who can do good job in military because women can be a good sodier in some duties. Besides, women should be allowed into combat because of the following reasons: women can do good at leadership position, increasing more jobs for women today and women can do some specific jobs that male can not complete. First of all, women can do good at leadership position. In the past decades, women did not allowed to join in high positions such as: CEO, boss, manager or they could not allowed to run for president because women are emotional. In addition, people thought that women are too sensitive when they face to problems so they often solve the problems by their heart than their mind.
Women do not have mentally tough enough to survive and physically strong enough that is 2 reasons to convince the reader that the author offers. However, although the author give some credibly example to show women get high-stress but it just happened some women. Almost women can work in high stress environment better than men. Darren Gaves give two of three argument is right but overall supporting the last argument are overgenalised and lack
It’s not just that she was a women that impressed me but her outward denial to conform to a world that oppressed her and women all across Europe based on sex. Not many people have the courage to stand up for their beliefs but she did so, knowing that support for her cause was scarce to none. She defended a women’s place in society, as well as flourishing in the literary realm and exercising her ability to converse, challenge, and reason in the art of rhetoric. Through these reasons and preservations, Christine De Pizan merits more than a three quarter page in a history of rhetoric
Women, were so unhappy without having rights and it made them feel less loved and wanted. With this theory being applied to this issue of Women’s Rights, they come out on top of the situation. It took 130 years or so for women to evolve in society. “Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the locus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of choosing one action/policy over other actions/policies. As such, it moves beyond the scope of one's own interests and takes into account the interests of others.” (Cavalier, 2002) With the Women’s Rights Movement, there were a lot of pros and cons that can about, mostly positives.
In fact, Sandberg exposes the necessity of more positive descriptions of working women and fewer conceptions that limit what they can do across the home and workplace. She acknowledges that there is a reason which contributes the increment of a lack in equal opportunity in the workplace and the reason is the leadership ambition gap. Fortunately, it is possible that a change in leadership ambition has been seen because many young women (66 percent) consider important the success in a profession compared to young men (59 percent), according to Sheryl Sandberg’s research (647). However, there are still women who do not describe themselves as a leader or a visionary and this situation does not help this prominent shift. In addition to her researched data, Sandberg’s illustrates with her own experiences about female accomplishments which those are often marked as a non-acceptable social conduct for women; for example, having a good prospect in the professional
However they face the challenge and constant pressure to perform in all areas of their life whilst balancing domestic and corporate lives. This gives rise to the issue of being drained and burned out. Although women in the developed world have been blessed with more equal opportunities after generations of unfair inferiority, the pressure put on a society's women to be perfect at whatever they are expected to do is huge. Even with the enormous developments that have been made over decades, women must still constantly fight for the right to create their own identities, no matter where they're from or what they believe in. They strive to be like their precedents and in the bargain lose their self-identity.
In addition, the literature reports several factors explaining this situation. These include the difficulty for women to reconcile work and family (Lips, 2006), the lack of opportunities for women to gain the work experience they need to progress hierarchically (Bell, McLaughlin & Sequeira, 2002), the discriminatory stereotypes in the workplace, such as the idea of less women's competence (Lips 2006, Carli 2001, Eagly & Karau 2002, Carli & Eagly 2001), or the argument of a typically feminine social-emotional leadership style (Rosener, 1990), which does not fit the predominantly masculine conception of organizational cultures (Landry,
However, the rights which were won seemed to exclude women. Many women did not like this and they wanted to be equal to men and they fought their own war of independence to receive that right. It started off small, but eventually grew into a big movement. Many average women would be remembered as someone great and their names would shine throughout history. One of these women was one known as Susan Brownell Anthony.
However, women are taking on more and more leadership roles; society is being forced to reexamine the assumption of men being the only effective leaders. Research on gender differences in leadership has been conflicting. Some states that women have different leadership style of leadership than men. Some states there are no major differences in the leadership behavior. (Boundless) A reoccurring theme has been the difference among men and women in leadership is communication and the relationship with followers.
Indra has broken the invisible glass ceiling. This invisible glass ceiling has been a discriminatory barrier that has kept women from moving to higher level positions in the business world. However, women like Indra and many others in our nation have broken this barrier in order to achieve the highest employment status in our nation. Objective Many of us do not realize the rate and extent of advancement that women have made in the American work force to reach the top of the corporate ladder. The purpose of this report is to present the fact that the role of women in the workplace has become more dominant.