Also the fact that teens are so rough towards one another there brains aren’t thinking on what can happen if there physical towards people violently. Adults sometimes complain that were not adults yet, reasons why we can’t drive, buy alcohol, nor vote. In Paul Thompson’s article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brian” published in The Sacramento Bee stated, “While research on brain-tissues loss can help us to understand teens better, it cannot be used to excuse their violent or homicidal behavior. But it can be used as evidence that teenagers are not yet adults, and the legal system shouldn’t treat them as such”. Jurors should think while there in court that treating teens as adults is something pretty much unfair, because why try teens as adults if there not even close to one.
It's also wrong. While young people must be held accountable for serious crimes, the juvenile justice system exists for precisely that purpose. Funneling more youth into the adult system does no good and much harm. Juveniles are not adults, and saying so doesn't make it so. Besides, we don't really mean it: When we try them in criminal court, we do not deem them adults for other purposes, such as voting and drinking.
There are certain facts and examples that make us understand the main point that kids cannot be tried as adults. Many juveniles are addressed in court for different crimes, petty crimes like stealing a purse or injuring another human to first degree murder and are tried as adults by the jury. Obviously, they cannot defend themselves well. For instance, kids cannot actively defend themselves when faced with the charges. “They are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their
Both options have their own benefits and risks, but rehabilitation is the only choice that we can make as a civilized nation to cope with this problem. Juvenile Offenders The criminal justice system as a whole should focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment in virtually every juvenile case. There are no set guidelines to determine the age in which an offender is considered
One of the differences is that juveniles do not have the right to a trial by a jury. In most states, trials include judge hearing evidence and then deciding whether or not the juvenile is a delinquent. A key difference is that juveniles are not prosecuted for committing crimes but rather delinquent acts. In some cases,
In most juvenile homicide cases, they are automatically put into the adult justice system for committing the adult-like crime. Some of these children are receiving punishments such as life in prison, even life in prison without parole. Although, the kids may have committed the “adult” crime it is unethical for youths to be tried as adults. Youths should not be tried as adults because they are too young to understand the adult criminal court and could receive cruelty from the state penitentiaries. Also, instead of sending the juveniles
Lesley Cardoza O’Kelly AP English III September 19, 2012 Juveniles in Court Juveniles may also commit crimes out on the streets, but that does not mean that they should be tried as adults. Many people argue about this topic and both sides have good arguments towards their opinion. Many say it is the parents fault by how they were raised, but yet others say it is because of their maturity levels. Many people think that juveniles should be tried as adults for a couple of reasons. Some people say that if you act upon somebody’s “Life, Liberty, and pursuit of happiness” then they should be tried as an adult no matter your age.
Research has shown that the brain of a minor is significantly under developed to that of an adult. Juveniles are unable to conceptualize and rationalize the actions in which they take-criminal or not. In recent years, policymakers and critics alike have made compelling arguments as to why juvenile courts should be abolished. Such arguments include the cost of juvenile courts, how intervention and rehabilitation do not work-although statistics disagree, and how the institutional integrity has been damaged through the use of waivers. There is no question that the juvenile justice system is not perfect, but what government entity is.
(Siegel & Walsh, 2005). There is not sufficient evidence to determine if a punishment alone will deter future delinquency. An example of specific deterrence is when an offender has been arrested for committing a crime and now the young juvenile will not commit the act again because of the severe
Teens can be often tricky by telling the parents that they can trust them and they can be responsible in the result of getting their privacy. [Citation needed] Once that privilege is given, the child you knew before is not the same and once the privilege of privacy is given, it’s hard to take back because they’veRef?already lost control of their kids. [Citation needed] Teens should not have the right to privacy because of the danger of internet, drugs, alcohol, and also teenage pregnancy. To start with, the internet can play a dangerous role in teens’ lives. When a teen is given too much privacy, they tend to make plenty of mistakes involving the internet.