The public services would be unprepared for the potential incidents also no problems or area of improvement would be highlighted which would then occur during the response this which can result in the serious injuries and even deaths of those involved in the incident. Nothing form past incidents would be learned from because of the poor relations and communications between services. This is why Inter-agency planning and communication is vital when the public services respond to a major incident, allows the public service to respond efficiently and effectively to incidents which will save peoples life’s and prevent any further escalation of the
1.2 Restrictive interventions are ways and methods that prevent an individual from carrying out a certain task. 1.3 Restrictive interventions must only be used if the individual is at risk of injuring themselves or others, or if coursing damage to property or illegal behavior. 1.4 If an incident occurred where restrictive intervention was needed then the clinic manager or senior nurse must be informed immediately. An incident form will be filled in and sent to human resources and the incident team within the trust. 1.5 Where possible the least restrictive interventions should be used as they can sometimes escalate the problem rather than defuse it.
Communication and Crisis Paper Tremeise Lane-Jackson HCS/320 May 22, 2013 Pukar Ratti Communication and Crisis The effective communication and preparedness are critical in emergencies and crisis situations. Communication is a necessity to society’s existence and ability to accomplish every day task depends on what the situation is. However, the effective communication could be the key issue of the organizations. The survival of an organization depends on its ability to handle appropriately crisis situations. This paper will discuss the emergency plans for a crisis or a disaster situation.
The risk management plan should include the following Risk Identification: This is the first step in risk analysis. KFF needs to identify risks associated with the implementation of chosen strategy. Some of the risks are poor planning, insufficient resources, lack of management commitment. Alternatives Analysis: A risk analysis is not sound if other risks alternatives are not explored. Alternatives may include the implementation of an effective strategic plan and developing a planning system/ Contingencies Poor Planning: KFF will need to make use of any of the implementation software for effective planning.
1.3 When considering if a restrictive practice is acceptable it must be clear about the intention or purpose of the practice. The use of a restrictive practice for the people we support can only be justified on the grounds of a health or safety need of the person where a multi-disciplinary assessment has agreed that no alternative practice exists that is less restrictive of the person. A behavioural support plan should be created. Physical intervention will only involve the least restrictive technique, applied with the minimum force, for the shortest duration to manage the situation safely. If an emergency situation should arise, it is permissible for staff to use minimum force to prevent serious injury to self or others provided this is for the least amount of time to bring the situation under control.
This may be difficult when their behaviour is threatening to their peers or members of staff but it underlines the need for planning and adopting well thought-out strategies where members of staff are enabled to intervene positively. Outcome 4 4.1 Challenging behaviour may include behaviours that are: • Repetitive / obsessive • Withdrawn • Aggressive • Self-injurious • Disruptive • Anti-social or illegal • Verbally abusive 4.3 Challenging behaviour is responded to by the following stepped approach: Risk Assessment Behaviour Management Plan Physical Intervention Plan Where there is judged to be an immediate risk of harm to the individual or others, proportionate restraint would be legitimate. It is a last resort, as an urgent action only to be used in exceptional circumstances using reasonable/minimal force. The stepped approach should be used if the service user is living in a residential unit, their own home, attending a day service or in any other community provision. When using the stepped approach, service users should be treated fairly, with respect and with dignity.
In a case of a serious incident the CQC would be notified along with GP, advocate and other professionals involved in the individuals care. 5) The least restrictive interventions should always be used in order to not harm the individual and to not increase their aggression or agitation if this is the case. Over use of restrictive interventions may also result in a violation of the individual’s rights and dignity. The use of the least restrictive interventions helps to ensure the safety of the individual as well as the dignity and rights of the individual. Using ‘heavy handed’ interventions may result in the situation escalating and the individual feeling more irate.
Theconditions are based on what those at risk believe to be true at the time, not on what the emergency managers know after the fact. It is also important to distinguish between the occurrence of an event and the potential for dangerous consequences resulting from that event. For example, trapped miners who realize that they will have sufficient air until rescue comes don’t panic. It is the possibility that the air will be exhausted that causes panic. Just being tapped does not cause the
Ensuring that the possible measures are in place is important. It is important that the threat assessment planning be imperative to reduce any chances of threat occurring. This is also beneficial to mitigating effects of the threat, resolving any implications, including building confidence of any involved parties. The primary concern with threat assessments is the concerns of security. One has also identified that organizing a maximum security plan includes one knowing: (1) What or who is being protected, (2) What assets, and (3) How important is it (Fennelly, 2011).
Here the case study is concerned with one aspect of the safety process for MSS, specifically risk analysis. It’s an important process, unfortunately performing risk analysis on MSS is not that easy. There are problems faced in MSS risk analysis, then we see possible solution. The following problems occurs during the analysis of MSS. According to some authors Condition of an MSS configuration that can lead to an accident is defined as MSS risk.