All of these solutions have many issues. Hydrogen needs more technology and about fifty years to become cheap and available. Bio-diesel would do more harm than good using food for fuel instead of for worldwide hunger. Solar and wind power would take a lot more development of gathering this natural resource and would take time. The only way to face this problem is head-on.
“You want to save the environment by building renewable energy, but in Vermont the only viable places for turbines are high-elevation ridges,” says Lukas Snelling, director of communications for energize Vermont, (Hosansky, pg.#24). Not only will it be expensive to build these turbines, but it may be detrimental to the environment as
This in turn naturally causes warmer temperatures. (Turk, Bensil, 2011). So while we have other factors that relate to warmer temperatures, and global warming, the first factor that comes into play on warming our environment is natural greenhouse gases, which we need to avoid another ice age. As stated the greenhouse effect is a natural phenomenon. In fact, without it, the “Earth’s average surface temperature would be a frigid 0 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) rather than its actual average temperature of around 59 °F.” (Turk, Bensel, 2011) If we did not have these natural gases we would not be discussing global warming.
These are the clues that prove the climate is changing day by day. Begley suggests there is no certain way to stop climate change due to global warming, so now people need to find out how they are going to make efficient adaptation plans to keep the planet safe from climate changing threat. Rising global temperatures have been accompanied by changes in weather and climate. Small changes in the average temperature of the planet can be a large and potentially
Fracking is bad for the environment. People still need natural gas or oil to live their life. It will take time to get all of the bugs worked out of fracking. Fracking companies are using the new technology to insure the protection of the environment. Fracking is a cheaper way of obtaining gas.
They utilized fossil fuel to increase the rate and scale of their production lines, even though over time this would eventually decrease the need for human labor. Through the processes of globalization and automation, the value and importance to the economy of the assembly line worker declined. These workers needed to work, so they started to move toward the service industry thus ushering
Where American energy policy is far less sensible is when it comes to the price reflecting the true cost. Tiny petrol taxes take no account of the damaging effects of pollution. This newspaper has long argued for a carbon tax to make dirty energy more expensive and thus curb demand. If that happened, some of the new oil might not be worth extracting: Canada’s heavy oil, for instance, emits about 6% more carbon dioxide than normal oil, which in turn can be 30% dirtier than gas. The biggest bonanza from all this new energy would be if the users paid the real cost of consuming oil and
He also points out the fact that people should focus on the present consumption of energy, rather than the future for energy conservation. Nader said that people should start conserving energy right now, such as not using electricity when it is not needed. Shellenberger has the argument other alternative energies such as coal cause over 3000 deaths. As the demand for energy increases with revolutionized technology, Shellenberger believes that nuclear energy would be much better compared to other alternative energies. Nader comes back with the fact that we should focus on conserving the alternative use of energies given to us today and not to create power plants that have additional risks caused by nuclear energy.
What message is he peddling that few seemingly want to hear? It’s twofold: No. 1, solar and wind power cannot meet the world’s voracious demand for energy, especially given the projected needs of emerging economies like India and China, and No. 2, nuclear power is our best hope to get off of fossil fuels, which are primarily responsible for the heat-trapping gases cooking the planet. Many in the environmental community say that renewable energy is a viable solution to the climate problem.
A Fracking Problem Drill, baby, drill, has been the mantra behind the ever-present need to find cheaper, more efficient energy. The most recent solution to our energy dilemma has been hydraulic fracturing, a process that may be causing more harm then benefit. While the natural gas produced from fracking, as the practice is nicknamed, is a cleaner alternative to both coal and oil, it still releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere promising no relief from the dangers of climate change. In addition to the climate change issue, the process of fracking is being investigated for claims of methane contamination of groundwater sources and possible negative geological effects, including human-induced earthquakes. The dangers