Ethical formalism that is a deontological system because its determinant is motive or intent and not consequence. This is the system that the cops chose because they believed their motive was in fact good and they weren’t worried about getting caught. All the police officers where worried about in this situation was getting drugs off the street and taking off some of the pressure they were being put under by society. I believe that if Detective Griffiths would have not gotten shot and killed and this was a normal raid and drug but this situation never blows up like it did. It was a very unfortunate accident where everything that could go wrong went wrong and it ended up with a dead officer and a criminal that got to walk away with no punishment at all.
I feel some crimes that have taken place in this country could have been stopped or lessened to a degree with a concealed firearm. The government can not ensure the 100 percent safety and wellbeing of all its citizens. For example the school shootings and workplace instances etc that happened in this country. But if there were more responsible law abiding people that had a concealed weapon on them some of these tragedies could have been avoided or at least minimized the damage that those criminals caused saving the lives of others is always a good thing. Criminals are not known for following the rules so all law abiding citizens have the right to defend themselves by any means needed.
* Without Hammurabi code there would be no law and without any laws there would be no order. * Without Hammurabi being born then the laws would have never existed and without them being existed then the world would go up-side down. * Without people having a motive of not doing something bad then, people won’t have to worry about law and not being caught and be able to do anything that they want. * It would have affected many by the violence rates going off the charts and everything off
Everyone in this society could do any harm to anyone that they wanted to but the protagonist was the only on in this society who couldn’t get into any violence or he would get into trouble. “Off”, I told him. “Game’s over”. (Knight 1). This technology would most definitely be detrimental because, I feel if one person is not allowed to get into any violence then that should go for everyone else in this society.
Criminal Procedure Policy Paper CJA/ 364 Criminal Procedure May 29, 2012 Criminal Procedure Policy Paper The role the criminal justice system plays in society is expansive. Criminal justice is designed to keep the public safe, to stop wrongdoing, to punish wrongdoers, and to provide order to society. Given this broad role there will be times when criminal justice will not perform all roles well. This means, of course, that criminal justice will often fail to meet public expectations. Ultimately, the needs people have for criminal justice mean that they believe the criminal justice system should be designed to pursue goals that fulfill
Alexander Hamilton thought that the judiciary review was the important factor of the checks and balance system and necessary citadel for protecting the public justice. He thinks the general liberty is the most important thing when considering the constitutional framework. Hamilton disagrees with the legislative branch exceeding its power as despotism but accepts the power of jurisdiction as a way to protect people, which is the more important. However, for Chief Justice Marshall, the judicial review was not a way to protect the people. It was a tool for political movements and to gain authority of the judicial branch.
Similarly, technology has had a significant impact on how laws have had to be created and reformed in order to protect the rights of consumers. The main problem associated with technology is the lack of regulation in the environment, making consumers particularly vulnerable to illegal practices, as well as the lack of international jurisdiction. Law reform has led to arrest warrants and extradition treaties being able to be issued, and assets of a foreign online marketer can be frozen if information is obtained about their location, amongst many other legal responses, and hence the legal system generally offers adequate protection against the misuse of
Lastly, we need guns for protection. People can only get away with shooting at people if nobody is shooting back. In a world where everyone carries around a gun everywhere they go, there would be no mass shootings. Sure, bad people would have guns, but they would be crazy to think of trying to shoot people in public. But even if a mentally ill person did try it, the public would easily overwhelm him or her and there would be no mass shootings.
No one wants that type of police force in their community. People want to feel protected by them, not living in fear that if they do the littlest thing wrong like get a traffic ticket they will get beat. They know in America cases like that are rare and compared to theirs, the government is pure. So why would they not want to come to the “land of dreams”? They have nothing to lose and maybe they want something to
In this society there is no such thing as competition. Also In “Harrison Bergeron,” social equality is inevitable do to the handicap devices. It is seemingly impossible to hold a conversation longer than a few seconds because afterwards the conversation is completely forgotten,” His thoughts fled in panic, like bandits from a burglar alarm” (141). If it isn’t any way for you to converse with an individual, it would also not be possible to express your problems, emotions, or goals with one another. But in this society these three things don’t matter at