Wealthier societies have exceptional educational services which include better teachers, utilities, and curriculum, whereas poorer societies just get by on the bare minimum. Children who do not become well educated will not succeed as far as they may like to because their knowledge and qualifications will limit them. Without that education, it is extremely difficult for individuals with low incomes to overcome the poverty barrier and they will most likely end up in a
This is why teaching financial literacy in high school will benefit the students later in their life. Secondly, the people who lack the financial literacy skills do not tend to save or plan for their future retirement. This is because they do not know how to make a financial plan, so they cannot plan their retirement and they have to depend on government pension because they are not self-reliant. Because of the lack of knowledge they do not save money and even if they save they do not know how to invest the money wisely. So
American teachers don’t earn as much money as business professionals and teachers in other countries such as Japan, Canada, and Germany. If society really cared about education, then teachers would be getting paid as much as lawyers, doctors, and accountants. Society is making it seem that educating young children in school is not that important. In other words, school teachers aren’t important. Barber argues that society is not serious about American education (The McGraw-Hill Reader, 153-162).
Children coming from little advantage miss out on an amount of things. One being education, coming from a low income schooling system that means that the education is not always up to par. Children that attend these schools will not be academically prepared for college if they do not have the skills they need. Coming from a low income schooling system where there are not enough books to go around and things of that matter are sometimes not skillfully prepared for furthering their education. Children are hindered by these kinds of schools, teachers and peers lay a big role in the children’s lives.
| Poverty | Economic Factor | Poverty is an Economic Factor because without the money to pay for good education or extra support the child may not do very well academically it has been proven that children who live in poverty do not perform as well as more affluent children. | Housing and Community | Economic Factor | Housing is an Economic Factor and can have an impact on the safety of the children brought up in the area. If they live in a poor area and live in bad conditions this will have a detrimental effect on the child. | Educational Environment | Economic Factor | The Educational environment is an Economic Factor. Affluent children may go to private school and perform really well.
Public universities should not differentiate between applicants on the basis of their ethnic, religious or social backgrounds because they are financed by the federal and state money. This enhances the social interaction factor in the establishment. Moreover, depending on the student's career choice, sometimes the prestige that the college may have will affect future employability. The public university has accumulated a certain prestige about the quality of teaching and is reputed to have recognized and experienced teachers, which is a definite plus because it will develop a better experience and learning course than a private university. To continue with the advantages of attending a State-Run Teacher Training College, democracy is also an important factor inside this type of college.
Also, they will not ask themselves are they really doing better. It is a fact that most of the charter schools have the same or lower standardized test scores as public schools. Many people do not think independently and look at how the schools are set up differently and if that has an impact on students. The audience’s perspective is not likely to be narrow because education is important to most people whether they have children or not. Many people do not look past the surface of what is going on with things like charging disciplinary fees and whether or not they are necessary.
However, there is no evidence to show that class inequities in educational attainment have shown any trends to decline. Social class background has a powerful influence on the child’s education attainment. For example, middle class families may get most of the places at elite universities, better grades, higher pay rate, and may stay longer in education. One popular theory of class differences in achievement is that richer parents can afford to send their children to private education, where- arguable- their quality of teaching is better than at state school, because they may have the better equipment to explain elaborate ideas, they have smaller classes so there is more teacher-pupil interaction during lesson time. Official statistics shows that 7% of the British children go to private schools, of the 7%, 90% of them go to elite universities, like Oxford, Cambridge.
This means working class students are disadvantaged when looking for jobs as higher paid jobs usually require qualifications at degree level, which means they are forced to look for lowly paid, usually primary or secondary sector jobs. Another policy is that of Private Education. This is seen as the most prestigious way of being educated and often provides the better education. However, this is because they are fee paid schools which means they are unaffordable by working class families, which excludes them from getting the best education possible, meaning there is a distinct difference in educational attainment across classes. However, a positive example of state policies enforced to reduce social class differences in achievement include Bursaries from universities, and Sure Start which is a programme to improve early education and childcare by offering two years free childcare to all 3 and 4 year olds.
This bought on Marketisation where schools try to attract other students by raising standards to show they are most successful. On the other hand, sociologists disagree as most educational reforms have not helped all students, only some or wasn’t very effective enough to help improve educational experiences. For example, the Foster Act wasn’t very helpful as the teaching was dire and students were less successful therefore resulted them in having weak qualifications and bad experiences. The Butler Act system with the 11+ exam was mostly based on middle class children therefore they had a better chance than working class. This was unequal as they had an advantage even though the test was the same.