Is It Best to Take a Relativist Approach to Euthanasia?

484 Words2 Pages
Is it best to take a relativist approach to euthanasia? Many would argue about what approach should be taken against euthanasia whether its absolutist or relativist and both approaches have valid arguments to support their approach to euthanasia. It is best to take a relativist approach to euthanasia as that approach will look at the circumstances the person is and will take into account what the person who wants to die is feeling and they should have a right to choose whether they want their own life to continue or not and it should not be contested if they choose that they want to die if their life is in unliveable conditions e.g. if someone’s whole body is paralyzed and cannot function without machines. However, by taking a relativist approach to euthanasia, you would be potentially killing someone and ending their future life just because at that moment they chose not to live. Although taking a relativist approach towards euthanasia could possibly allow someone to end their life and their future, the approach gives people who do not want to live their life as it is the option to end it on their own terms and gives them the freedom to choose. It is best not to take a relativist approach to euthanasia as by someone choosing to die and ending their life it could also affect people who are related or involved with that person and might cause guilt or/and even regret to them which is a depressing outcome for all, for example in the Diane Pretty case Diane wanted to die and her husband was offering to put her out of her misery but if he was allowed to due to Diane choosing to die then he might feel some guilt and regret after killing her and realise he made a mistake or misses he wife. On the other hand, relatives to a person who wants to die might support that decision as they see that life will be too hard if living with a serious condition and might not want to
Open Document