More liquor will be sold to the patrons, which will increase the amount of money the government can make. An alternative policy is to legalize drinking but drive up the monetary price though new taxes. As long as young adults' alcohol demand is at least somewhat responsive to price, taxation can reduce consumption by as much as the current legal drinking age of twenty-one does. (Donald Kenkel, Acess my Library,3) If eighteen year olds do not have legal access to even a beer in a public place, they are ill equipped to deal with the responsibilities that come with drinking when they do have the right. Local business will also do better by being able to sell alcohol to more people as well.
They believe that by making the drinking age a lower age, alcohol would become more accepted in American society and it would encourage more people to engage in drinking, at a younger age, as well as adults. Mothers Against Drunk Driving fight for keeping the drinking age at 21 because their organization believes that a younger drinking age would result in more drunk drivers. They think that the younger people are who are legally aloud to drink, the more irresponsible America’s alcohol-drinking people will be. Also, some people think that lowering the drinking age to 18 will result in more youth participating in binge drinking. When people binge drink, they are more likely to engage in other illegal
As a result, it wouldn’t solve the whole problem of underage drinking, but it would be an important step in the correct direction to help young adults. As we have seen, the legal drinking age in the USA should be lowered to 18. We already recognize 18 year olds as responsible adults that can benefit the society in many different ways. Also, lowering the legal drinking age to 18 would be consistent with the freedom that supposedly every single habitant in the United States has. Additionally, people at 18 are mature enough to decide what is correct in their own lives with the help of the government and
This is a great opportunity to teach those who are underage so they will have an idea of knowing their limits earlier. As they grow older, they will have the ability to control the alcohol consumption. Also, colleges would be able to regulate alcohol use so that students won't become overly intoxicated. If young adults are taught how to drink, it will neglect them from being an alcoholic. The final example is that there will be fewer underage arrests.
How does it sound?What I mean is if you can do all these at the age of 18, why cant make your own decisions about alcohol consumption? I know that lowering drinking age to the age of 18 will probably led more traffic accidents, more crimes and more early teen fertility. However there is one truth is that people can not
This is the main reason that a lot of people want to have the driving age raised. They think that when these teens are a little older, their risk of crashing will significantly decrease, making roads safer for all. The problem with this logic is that the main reason that this age group has the highest crash rate is that they are the least experienced. If the driving age is raised, the only thing that will change is the age group of the inexperienced drivers. Instead, a good idea would be to increase the amount of time a teen needs a permit for, in order to get more experience before actually getting a license.
There are definitely people who are as young as 15 years old who have more maturity than some 50 year olds. A third right is that a person can enlist into the United States military at age 18. A common phrase heard in my family at gatherings and holidays, is that “If you’re old enough to take a bullet for this country, you’re old enough to have a drink in this country.” Yet another right is that a person can buy a gun when they are 18. An 18 year old can also be called into jury duty, which can be a huge responsibility. Furthermore, teenagers can be tried as an adult sometimes when they are as young 16.
First and foremost, the legal drinking age should be eighteen because when teens turn eighteen they are legally an adult. As an adult, a person should be trusted to make responsible decisions and not over do it. Secondly, the drinking age should be eighteen because of a lower drinking age would decrease the amount of underage drinking and limit how much trouble young people can get into. Lastly, the drinking age should be eighteen because liquor stores could charge younger people more taxes for alcohol which would help fund state programs. Some effects of a lower drinking age could also include increased health benefits.
A good majority of high school graduates and most freshmen that enter college are at the age of eighteen, at which point they are legally considered adults. From this age an individual can decide whether they want to enter the military or start their life right into the work force. Whatever the person’s thoughts after high school may be, these young men and women are considered young adults and have the choice whether they want to get married, vote, become guardians, smoke, and serve our country. For some reason the American community seems to think that an eighteen year old adult is not suitably mature enough to choose whether or not they want to drink alcoholic beverages. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act in 1984, made the legal drinking age twenty one.
The children can also work by themselves to earn the money for the fun. In conclusion, I think it is better to lower the age of drinking. There should be kind of equality in all the country. If the children of the Europe come to America for study, due to the inequality of the drinking age the student from Europe may not follow the rules of the USA. Like this many student come from different country for study in the USA.