International Relations of the Middle East: Islam, Imperialism and State

3122 Words13 Pages
International Relations of the Middle East: Islam, Imperialism and State Formation POLM043 2011-12 ‘Realism best explains the foreign policies of modern Middle Eastern states’. Discuss with reference to TWO regional case studies. Introduction In its various forms, realism has been the dominant paradigm of Middle East international relations ever since the Second World War. Realism prioritises national interests and security over ideology and moral concerns and advocates that foreign policies should be directed in order to achieve power, maintain national security, and pursue other national interests. Realists believe the international system to be anarchic: in other words, that there is no authority or organization above the nation state. Indeed, the Middle East is one of the regional sub-systems where this anarchy appears most in evidence....its states are still contesting borders and rank among themselves; and there is not a single one that does not feel threatened by one or more of its neighbours This essay employs an understanding of realist theory in order to develop a hypothesis with which to analyse the foreign policies of modern Middle Eastern states. Drawing on the case studies of Egypt and Israel, it concludes that, although the complex areas of national interests and domestic politics cannot, for various reasons, be fully explained by classical or neo-realism, the foreign policy decisions of both countries are anchored in realism and will continue to be bound to the concepts of power and security. As a theory, realism truly gathered force during the twentieth century, through the emergence of various branches and sub-branches of thought as a consequence of intellectual debate: both within the realist school itself, and between realists and its critics (chiefly constructivists). Particularly with respect to the identification and
Open Document