International Productivity Comparisons of France and Usa

3205 Words13 Pages
Economics 404 Final Desiree Danel International Productivity Comparisons of France and USA Productivity Comparisons In this study I show that France and the USA do indeed have different factor price differences and discuss how this affects factor productivities and exports of goods in the two countries. I will use the concept of comparative advantage and apply the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory, to describe how endowment factor differences affect productivity in light of changing input factor or price changes in other countries. I then discuss how these factor differences break down into productivity differences in capital, labor, and social benefit payments (also referred to as taxes) using three different matrices. 1) The Stolper-Samuelson is used to identify how change in the price of a good affects the factor prices (capital, labor, taxes) change by computing the local factor content 2) The Factor Price Conversion Matrix shows us the Stolper-Samuelson effects of one country in the technology matrix of another country in order to compare how price changes in one country will affect prices of factor resources in another country and 3) The Rybczynski Matrix shows how changes of factor inputs affect quantity of output. Comparative Advantage & Factor Endowments The Heckscher-Ohin Theory was based on the concept of David Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage which states that a country will export products that it has an abundant resource of (capital or labor) while importing the goods which require resources the country is scarce in, assuming every country is competitive in at least one good. Sources of comparative advantage are abundances of resources, either capital or labor, whose abundance drives down the price and makes the good or service relatively cheap to produce, thus making a country competitive in the world market. This report compares
Open Document