Is Stereotyping Inevitable? Yes Issue Social psychologists have long been interested in stereotypes and prejudice, concepts that are typically viewed as being very much interrelated according to Patricia Devine. According to the text, many classic and contemporary theorists have suggested that prejudice is an inevitable consequence of ordinary categorization processes. This approach suggests that stereotypes are automatically applied to members of the stereotyped group. According to Ehrlich; ethnic attitudes and stereotypes are part of the social heritage of a society and no one can escape learning the prevailing attitudes and stereotypes assigned to the major ethnic groups.
It represents a preoccupation with adhering to rules and established procedures, maintaining a low profile, and blending in with a particular environment to avoid calling attention to ourselves. When we rely on established routines to determine how we do things, we risk losing our sense of being unique and an individual. These styles reflect some of my behavior which probably was inherited by family upbringing and personal friendships over the years. Some of these styles represent me but not all. It is just a snapshot of my personality in time.
Rather, they interpret observations and several preexisting prototypes of others to enable us to create a richly detailed impression of another. Thus, getting to understand how the process by which these prototypes are shaped, changed, shared across a group of people that constitute a culture and how individuals apply them in categorizing others is a critical to understand identity(Spears, Lea, & Lee, 1990). According to the Social Identity Theory, individuals do not have a
To alleviate this, I created a viable vision statement describing the team’s objectives and how those objectives will lead to the end state. The vision included how the teams would behave and some team values. This step must be accomplished expeditiously to provide purpose and clarity to the task with the hope of motivating the team to contribute selflessly. Next, I conducted a thorough review of each team member history and culture to become aware of potential challenges as it relates to communication and cultural barriers. According to researcher, one of the leading causes of failure for multicultural teams is mistrust which can result from communication and cultural barriers.
Cultural relativism in my opinion is how you look at someone’s culture, beliefs, and rituals although you may not do these same things you can agree to them as being relative or relevant to their own personal and social views. Cultural relativism is important to anthropologist because when they do fieldwork they have to look at cultures with a holistic view and have to see everything done and in their own point of view and relate it to the culture of the society of people doing it. Not to be understood by other people but totally understood by the society doing it so right or wrong is culture specific. There is no standard for morality in today’s society nobody has the right to be judged by their customs. Cultural relativist believe that all cultures are worthy in their own right and are of equal value no one that is not in the society can say whether it is right or wrong for some of the practices done to be wrong.
Team 2. Executive Summary OB4: Job Attitudes & G4: Obtaining information and Evaluating people Obtaining information and Evaluating people The skill of obtaining information can help us to: Better grasp organizational capabilities, deal with project management issues, and visualize market opportunities; nevertheless we have to be very aware of the cultural comparisons that could block the flow of information. In general, concerns about sharing information directly are more pronounced in hierarchical, group oriented cultures where enduring relationships are key personal asset. More country-specific factors can influence the flow of information as well. Recommendations for obtaining information are among others: To see really what is there through the attitudes and perceptions, asking via a third party, and that could be by the form of triangulating, even changing the setting, because the degree of openness in communication is often based on the context, other option is to explain background and context or to add background to your requests, showing genuine interest and demonstrating very clearly the level of you interest or depth of your concern to be taken seriously, showing precedent because the past is as important in the future for many countries, probing politely but persistently your experience or the experience of others, never underestimate the persistent repetition of a question or similar type of questions, sometimes even rephrase the request, in order to really know whether you are getting your request made, and clarify and confirm, sending a follow up confirmation in writing will always help you certify that there’s an agreement.
However, the culture establishes the norms and defines how leadership has to work. A leader is the responsible to understand how to create people alignment in different cultures, and to cause damages to cultures that are not working properly, according to Shein (2004). Dickson et al. (2012) outlines that the way leaders are perceived in several cultures can be compared as culture impact in leadership. Those who do something relevant to society, whose distribution of power is hugely stratified, can be in the future imitated for other cultures.
Culture can be defined as that set of values and beliefs, norms and customs, and rules and codes that socially define groups of people. Cultures differ in some fundamental ways: Basic philosophical differences about religion and the nature of the universe contribute to a culture’s overall worldview. Also in terms of locus of control: Control cultures believe in an internal locus of control; they feel that people control their own destinies; "Don’t let anything stand in your way" might be a motto.
Cultural relativism Denise Lewis ANT 101: Introduction to Cultural Anthropology (GSF1517D) Instructor: Fae Goodman Date Submitted The comprehension of a different culture practices tends to be difficult when only used in comparison to one’s own culture and practices. It may seem not normal for one’s own standards yet to those of the opposite cultures our own practices may not be considered as normal or logical to them as well. In order to be able to understand any culture, one must really know the meaning of cultural relativism. “Cultural relativism is the idea that the significance of an act is best understood by the standards of the actor’s own culture” (Crapo, 2013). Using this definition will lay the foundation of this paper.
As James Rachels said, “Cultural Relativism might be true, but it might lead to some consequences, such as no longer being able to say that the customs of other societies are morally inferior to ours, or we could decide whether actions are right or wrong just by consulting the standards of our society and even the idea of moral progress would be called into doubt.” Cultural Relativism has some good advantages; it helps us to keep an open mind about other people´s beliefs. On the other hand, Cultural Relativism is not a good system that should be followed by each culture separately because there are some universal rules that should be followed, for instance no murder. Laws should be created under morality, and they might not be perfect, but they are the best rules that we as humans have. Even though societies still have arguments about their beliefs because it is impossible to have complete peace because of our differences. For example, For the Greeks it was believed that it was wrong to eat the dead, whereas the Callatians believed it was right to eat the dead, or the Eskimos saw nothing wrong with infanticide, whereas Americans believed infanticide is immoral.