Homicide is murder but not all homicides are illegal some are considered justified homicide an example of justified homicide is when its done as an act of self defense. Homicide is a heinous crime that is very serious and will result in going to jail for a long time.This is what homicide is. Scenario Two: What is the most serious offense Lori can be convicted of? Explain. Lori committed a controversial crime that many people believe was the right call to make but a crime is a crime you can’t break the law just because you don't like it and in this paragraph i will explain to you what law Lori will most likely be charged for.
Also, incarcerated persons might not want treatment because they don’t recognize that they have an illness or they have lost touch with reality all together. When and if the offender experiences a psychotic break, they are taken to a facility so that a doctor can prescribe medication, they can also be forced to take the medication by court order. One expert contends that “we have created a revolving door in which mentally ill cycle from clinics, to homelessness, to jail”. The offenders in California, Texas, Arizona, Maryland, and Oregon, all go through a screening process. They do questionnaire, and or observation through an interview that is done by jail employees or a nurse.
His argument had effect the classification system, in DSM-IV the new identity are given to those patients so they would be accept by the society. However, there are still ethical concerns since the patients are still labeled as “abnormal”, even though they behave normal. Scheff argued that giving people labels would probably effect their behavior by self fulfilling prophecy, which means, people would behave in ways they think they are. They would automatically play the role of mentally disorder and show more obvious symptoms by knowing that they are mentally ill. Doherty argued that people who do not accept their labels are tend to improve faster, which means people who accept the labels did not improve as fast. In a study carried out by Langer and Abelson, it shows that people who are labeled as mentally dis order tend to endure discrimination.
This is a pivotal part in terms of maintain the functioning of society and to ensure that people don’t go around breaking laws wherever and whenever they want. The criminal justice system is therefore a central part of society and without is society would quickly deteriorate into chaos. There are however a number of issues in the criminal justice system. Some of these issues include false convictions and bias within the courtroom. The tutorial discussion this week was essentially discussing how the system operates and some of the flaws within the system such as false convictions which come about through human error or in extreme cases racial bias (Alberto F. Alesina, Eliana La Ferrara, 2011).
His abnormal behavior and clear signs of mental disturbance display a tragic example of violence caused by pathology. It is against my moral judgment to represent James Holmes in trial, as I pride my psychological experience and expertise on a strong ethical foundation. Therefore, in my professional opinion it is unethical to stand before a jury and testify in trial for the defendant. To deem him mentally insane in order for him to be vindicated of his violent mass murder crime by utilizing the insanity plea to escape jail time would never leave my conscience. James Holmes committed brutal and lethal acts on July 20, 2012 in Colorado that were premeditated and precisely calculated; Acts that resulted in the tragic death and serious harm to several innocent, harmless civilians.
The Effects of Felony Convictions RaShawnda Anderson Kaplan University The Effects of Felony Convictions The effects of felony convictions are a very hot topic in America. This is because there are many Americans that commit crimes and are punished yet still deal with the effects for years to come. Felons are a part of society and should be treated as such especially if they are reformed. A person can commit a crime that results in a felony and twenty years later still suffer the harsh reality of certain privileges being taken away. Yes, an individual should be punished for their crimes but the effects of a felony conviction should not include or affect that person’s right to vote, finding employment, or the pursuance of a higher education.
Desmond LeSure Professor Bolton ENGL 1020 19 April 2012 “Is the Three-Strikes Law fair and ethical?” There are individuals who were known as habitual criminals who constantly repeated the cycle of committing a crime, getting arrested, and eventually getting released. In 1993, Americans noticed that this was very costly to the public because the process of arresting and trying these criminals was expensive. American tax payers were beginning to become concerned with this issue and wanted something to be done about habitual offenders. Society is pushing the issue that it was more logical to keep repeat criminals in jail and not release them to commit more crimes. Politicians listened to society and executed a law that would put an end to
Kylie Carroll~10/11 ------------------------------------------------- Per. 5 Exploratory Insanity Plea Yes, I do think there should be an insanity plea. If someone was guilty of a crime, but claimed they were insane when the crime was committed. That person should have to spend the same amount of time they would be originally sentenced, but they would have to spend that time in a mental institute. However, if someone is so mentally ill that they do not know right from wrong, they should not be able to freely roam the streets.
Many criminals commit crimes because they know that their offenses have light sentences and in no time they will be out on the streets wreaking havoc once again. This bill would make it harder for armed robbers to be out in the streets soon after their conviction and highly discourage them to repeat their offense. If a criminal knows that he can commit an armed robbery and only get three months sentence I believe he will more likely repeat his offense. If a criminal knows that an armed robbery conviction would give him six months in prison I believe that would be more than enough for the criminal to think it over and over before committing armed robbery. Many criminals do think before Prison term policy recommendation proposal 4 they commit a crime.
Criminal defense of insanity is one type of popular strategy which is tried to be used by many criminal offenders whom are found to be guilty of their crimes or are about to fall within law’s hands. This type of defense is not just common in the courtroom but within the public television shows or movies, it is that of a great factor that plays roles well in sitcoms or popular movie scenes. What the insanity defense means is that a person has indeed committed the crime, but cannot be trialed or be sentenced to any jail time or anything because he/she did not know they were doing anything wrong due to their illness. There was case of a women by the name of “Andrea Yates who filled a bath with water and methodically drowned, one by one, her five children; Noah, 7 years old, John, 5 years, Paul, 3 years, Luke, 2 years, and Mary, who was just 6 months” and after being sentenced to life in prison and not the death penalty she was retrialed and clarified after she pleaded insanity (web.ebscohost.com). The affirmative criminal defense can be described as being like an option of actually agreeing with the prosecutors, but with the