Informed Consent & Autonomy

1486 Words6 Pages
Informed Consent & Autonomy Introduction: In this paper I argue that consent is a key issue in deciding on patient treatment. The paper is divided into three main sections. In the first section I briefly explore The Doctrine of Informed Consent. In the second section, I will reflect on scenarios for health care practitioners that hinge on the question of patient consent, and consider various approaches that have been recommended for Health Care Practitioners to take in these cases. In the third section, I consider the question whether there is a single basic principle underlying all the recommendations made in part two. Section 1: Since 1980, doctors have not been allowed to operate on patients without the patient’s consent. Doctrine of Informed Consent requires medical practitioners to obtain informed consent from their patients before operating or subscribing them to any type of treatment. Informed consent constrains the behavior of doctors to prevent tyranny of doctors. The Doctrine of Informed Consent requires the disclosure, comprehension, voluntariness, competence and consent of the patient (Omadagain, 2011). Disclosure encourages that the patient is informed about her medical condition, possible treatments, and expected outcomes for each treatment option. Comprehension means the patient must be told what she/he is getting into. In other words, the disclosure should make sense and be understood by the patient. The voluntariness of the patient, without outside forces is critical. The patient must be allowed to make his/her own decision. The patient must be competent and have the mental capacities needed to make a decision. The patient must be conscious, alert, reasonable, old enough, and not suicidal. Last but not least, the patient must provide written consent to treatment. According to Gerald Dworkin, failure to providing informed consent to the

More about Informed Consent & Autonomy

Open Document