Evidence that criticises the marxist perspective states that there are many instances where religious leaders or movements have challenged the established order and help promote change. The general marxist approach is similar to the functionalist. They both tend to believe that religions have the same interests and ideologies. By being opposites on the political spectrum Marxists and Functionalists both agree that the purpose of religion is to benefit the ruling class. Marx and Durkheim share the assumption that religion was a product of society and that it is a conservative force.
He believes that it was the role of the government that would keep these instincts in line. If these instincts were not controlled it would lead to war. Hobbes views were shaped by his life experiences during the English Civil War. He believed people were evil and selfish. Hobbes idea that “people orbiting their ruler” leads me to the idea of socialism/communism (Sayre, 2012).
Secondly, it makes social inequality seem fair and just, justifying social hierarchy. For example, the monarchy used the notion of “divine right”. To challenge the monarch was seen as an act of treason but also as a blasphemous rejection of God. Furthermore, religion prevents social change and maintains capitalism. Therefore, religion is a conservative force.
Erich Fromm Critique Essay In discussing obedience, people usually will think that obedience is the right thing to do, and disobedience is in the wrong. In Erich Fromm’s essay, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, he states that around different places, people all believe that the world we live in came about as an act of disobedience. In his argument, he states multiple examples taken from the Greek myth of Prometheus, and of Adam and Eve, with the Original Sin. Erich even assumes that the beginning of our race starts through disobedience: “[our] intellectual development was dependent on the capacity for being disobedient..”(Fromm 684) With this statement, Erich Fromm strongly argues his view that “human history began with an act of disobedience, and it is not unlikely that it will be terminated by an act of obedience.”(Fromm 683) In his article, Fromm discusses his reasoning for believing that history began with disobedience, and will end in obedience. Erich Fromm talks about the different kinds of obedience, and how they can help one’s society, or even destroy it.
It was religion that drove the New England colony and Middle Atlantic colony down two starkly opposite paths, but one was a religion of uniformity and government by God, and the other, a religion promising exactly the opposite. The doxology, or lack thereof, practiced in these two neighboring settlements was the basis for their entire beginnings, and the foundation for every facet of life within, the New England colonies standing united by a common faith, and the Middle Atlantic colonies in which freedom was the only common religion. These two settlements were hugely contrary but both began, and were fueled by the religion that they employed. The hand of European religious persecution ignited the spark of immigration to the new world of America. The New England colonies, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland were conceived and established as "holy experiments" by the puritans.
So, God has the power to lead people to find the right way. God is love. God loves everyone and asks for nothing in return. The wish of God is obliging for his citizen. God is
The United States fought of the oppression over the colonies in the late 1700’s by first peacefully protesting the unjust taxes waged against them. Slowing building into a common belief that the people in the colonies had the same rights as those of Britain, and asking for the same rights. After the government chose to ignore their rights, and tax more or in and out of the colonies did the American raise arms to separate from the tyrant rule of Britain. We still find certain laws unjust and willingly break them to bring forth the point of wrongdoing, and that issues need to be addressed in today’s society for the betterment of our children. We have people that chose to not wear their seatbelt in their vehicle.
Extrinsic – external. Catholic perspective: free will – ability to choose, decisions. Community – social beings: respect dignity. Freedom is INTRINSIC based upon eternal moral codes: Decalogue 10, Beatitudes 12 Conscience – Free Will: moral compass. Ability to make a choice, conscience is a judgment, follow your conscience: must be educated and informed, conscience may be “incorrect”, sanctuary – core – to meet God
In all religions people are faithful to whatever religion by following a set of rules and being faithful to a god and, in Scientology you are still following a set of rules and being faithful but to yourself. You are keeping your spirit and your body in good
The first of these dangers is susceptibility of Americans to extreme individualism, and isolation from the community. Secondly Tocqueville fears that American’s would develop an excessive desire for material things. Moreover, he believes democracy would cause American’s to lose the ability to think for themselves and, instead conform to society. Tocqueville’s final concern of Democracy was that an intense aspiration for total equality would in turn create a society who sacrifices many rights. Tocqueville argues that the only thing which will keep Americans away from these dangers, which would undoubtedly lead to despotism is religion as source of moral education.