During the creation of Constitution, each state had to approve it. During this time there were people who supported it, Federalist and who did not, Anti-Federalists. I am siding with Anti-Federalist since they were right in thinking they did not want to give all their power away to the national government. If you lived in a state separate from where government state is established, how would you get your problems in your state solved if you had a government who was telling you what to do but not really knowing what problems you had in your state. If I lived back in that time, and having just finished the war with Britain where we finally got our independence, I would remind people all the issues we had.
We could bring up the case as a sample to demonstrate what we are discussing about. However, adding a question to prove our point is not recommended in academic writing. The subject line information to identify the situation has to be included on the head of the memo. In addition, clarity, correctness, and courtesy are very important and they represent for our efforts. The memo should be clearly written and organized in direct order, beginning with the objective and then systematically and covering the vital bits of information (Rentz, 2008).
It truly is a political process. The problem is that when are talking about our individual protections and those of our nation there should be no politics involved. It should be what works best for the nation at that time and is best for the common good. When people can begin to forget about their own personal ambitions and goals and think about what is best for us all then maybe one day this argument will have some sort of
"America will never get its act together until we recognize how much trouble we're really in, and how much effort and shared sacrafice is needed to stop the decline. Only then will we be able to begin resuscitating the dream" (567). Cal Thomas, the author of "Is the American Dream Over?," agrees with Bob Herbert's statement "America will never get its act together until we recognize how much trouble we're really in" (Thomas 570). But Thomas only agrees with Herbert's statement to a certain extent. Thomas feels as though that Herbert is right but he's only pointing out the obvious in the matter.
FDR felt that the American government was going to fix all the problems of the people and make their lives improve over time. His ‘New Deal’ plan really stresses this fact. He knew that the people could accomplish anything with just a little coaxing from their leader. Hoover thought that their needed to be less government control and the people had to do some things for themselves. He wanted them to be able to fix their problems themselves and let the government do more important jobs and have to worry about them less.
Response Paper #1 “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Passage Selection The first passage I chose that helped me better understand the reading was the line: “If I tried to get away with it, then other people would try to get away with it – and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else.” It gives you the idea that what we now see in our modern society would have been almost completely incomprehensible to far past centuries. It also makes you wonder if the common desire for equality that we now strive for to make things equal for everyone can be taken too far. The second passage that I felt was important to me was: “Gee- I could tell that one was a doozy,” ”You can say that again.” ”Gee- I could tell that one was a doozy.” This selection was important to me because it gave me a better understanding of the situation. The previous events in the literature were very drastic and sad.
It is also my belief that by enabling people to share their concerns with the organizations vast number of members can empower someone who may feel they do not have much of a voice when it comes to change. I absolutely find that this is what our country needs more of because at times it is hard to for me to completely have faith that our elected officials really know and understand the trouble of the common man. I found this part of the site to be useful and I may even start a campaign or two here in my own state to get our representatives to be more involved in insuring every student has access to the arts and that they all
Assessment activity 10 1. It is impossible that we only identifying the risk, instead of fully researching that can be understand, the potential impact dissolved and find out the most proper way to manage and identified it. In the process to find out the understanding of the risk, it may cause some unpredictable effect, such as the risk has broke out early than expected, the effect area was more serious than we expected. Those are some conceive situation when the risk going unstable/ unpredictable, so when we plan to identify the risk, we must assume any worse situation as we can, it ensure the property and human being’s safety. 2.
Although many people think that all immigrants should go through assimilation, however I believe that people can become a part of other culture without erasing their own background, because of several reasons. The first and the most important reason to be against assimilation is freedom aspect. Almost 250 years ago the people who lived in the United States decided to create a new country. A country where people are equal, and have freedom to choose how to live. The majority of immigrants who came to the United States was seeking freedom and trying to escape
These arguments will focus largely on the United States of America, as it has been pivotal to the importance of national security in the modern world. Ultimately, this essay will argue that the need for national security outweighs the right to individual liberties in liberal democracies, and that the liberal theories examined do not adequately allow for matters of state importance. Before an analysis of liberty in democracies can begin it is