One of the most basic debates in sociology is that about the relative power of agency vs. structure. On the one hand, some people argue individual people have a great capacity for acting freely and without constraints by larger social structures. Indeed, some argue that "social systems" do not really exist at all - they are merely convenient abstractions which have no reality outside of our minds and language. If social systems do exist in some fashion, it is only as a result of the actions of free human agents. On the other side of this debate are those who argue that social systems greatly constrain, if not completely determine, the actions of individuals.
* What are the legal requirements? * Didn’t break any laws, related to him applying company funds towards personal use even though his act was solely beneficial to himself alone. What are the ethical duties? * Maintain price-competitive markets will ensure that scares resources are used to optimally satisfy consumer needs. * Pareto Optimality wasn’t obtained because maximum benefits of most wanted goods and services produced at minimum cost of least wanted resources.
separate the people from the problem Separating the people from the problem means separating relationship issues (or "people problems") from substantive issues, and dealing with them independently. People problems tend to involve problems of perception, emotion, and communication. Perceptions are important because they define the problem and the solution. While there is an "objective reality," that reality is interpreted differently by different people in different situations. When different parties have different understandings of their dispute effective negotiation may be very difficult to achieve.
Would changes of outline been made? A few practices examined inside Chapter 1 were exemplified all through this case, for example, groupthink, dissemination of obligation, spectator unresponsiveness, speculation toward oneself, still, small voice and good judgment. The substitution configuration was impractical to finish for the timetable of conveyance that was guaranteed to clients. Since Lawson brought the issue to Warren's consideration, he denied the outline being the reasonable justification. Once Lawson went to Sink, it place him in a troublesome position.
Going against the majority might lead to exclusion or rejection from the group. This is called normative social influence. Another type of social influence is informational social influence, it is based on our desire to be right. We conform because we don’t know what the correct way to behave is. In this situation, we look to others for information about how to behave.
A person cannot do “whatever they like” because in many cases that would include things that are actually not beneficial to them. (Doing drugs might be an example. It might seem satisfactory at the moment, but ultimately, it damages their body.) A person must only do what seems to be in their best interest. Under moral egoism, no moral duty exists to anyone other than self.
The Declaration of Independence clearly states that, “all men are created equal,” but by these percentages, they are not proving that all men are created equal. If we were created equal, it would not matter what race you are or what you look like- some people think otherwise when it really should not matter at all. “The rich and the poor are not so far removed from each other.” Meaning that the rich and poor aren’t any different from each other, they’re basically all the same- there’s not really a difference between them. Now days, the similarities between the rich and poor are increasing. The difference between the rich and the poor is quite simple.
So how can we avoid this behavior if and when we recognize it as such? First we need to identify all the components Prejudice is usually a negative incorrect unjustified attitude or prejudgment directed towards someone based on personal views of a particular social group or groups. Someone that’s prejudice towards others may not act according to their beliefs, but still may not discriminate against them. One line of logic that is used is to justify ones prejudice and stereotypes is to justify the system used; by using social inequalities, they legitimizing beliefs, attitudes and myths. By placing emphasizing a lower-status groups weakness, according to their weaknesses and flaws, they justify those that are in a higher status maintaining the status quo and in doing so allowing the higher status individual to feel secure in their position.
To allow human beings to be human, meaning the capability of humans to choose what they do and do not do and strive for whatever personal endeavors they aspire for, necessitates that the fundamental liberties be protected and held equal. These liberties are not to be influenced, changed, or tinkered with by economical, financial, or any other circumstances; all persons are entitled to these liberties regardless of status or wealth. Although the first principle is priority over the second principle and other potential conflicts, it does however still have its limits. Certain liberties not listed above, such as freedom of contract, are not protected or granted by the first principle since they are not basic liberties. The second principle of justice declares, “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b)
In the end, the free economic system can fulfill almost everyone's needs and wants, while ensuring profit for everyone. A free economic system discourages judgment based on race, creed, color or political affiliation. A company that refused to sell its products to certain types of people or refused to hire or do business with certain groups would face higher costs than