Trying to explain how the genes of an individual will affect one's personality. Using the humanistic and biological theories to best describes my personality. Flip a Coin Myers' Briggs Personality Tests Flip a coin Myers' Briggs Personality Tests completed on team members Joann and Raymond. I will be comparing and contrasting each person using biological and humanistic approaches of personality. Explain two characteristics from the biological and humanistic approach that I agree, disagree, and why.
I will also briefly look at both theories in terms of power relations and structure / agency which can have a great influence on individual difference and personality traits. . To conclude, both theories take a different ontological and methodology approach towards individuals, which means that the aims of their research and the knowledge produced by can be quite different. The trait theory it was developed by Eysenck & Rachman, their theory is based in the experimental scientific and psychometric tradition, whereby assessments were used to access personality. This theory on personality was based upon biological explanations whereby he believed that individual’s personality traits were caused by a persons biological and genetic make-up (cited in Butt, 2012).
Many bio psychologists also agree that because the development of the brain is determined (at least partly) by the genes a person inherits, that behaviour may be influenced by genetic factors. Galton The hypothesis originally proposed by Galton and elaborated by Spearman, that there is a functional correspondence between sensory discrimination and general intelligence. This continues to spark debate. The central importance of sensory discrimination to theories of intelligence can be traced to Galton's (1883) hypothesis that individual differences in mental ability are correlated with fine differences in sensory discrimination. Sensory discrimination was introduced to provide a mechanism linking intelligence to heredity.
The function of genes is to tell the body how to function and to determine the levels of hormones and neurotransmitters in the body. However, they also determine the structure of the brain, e.g. schizophrenia patients were found to have larger ventricles in their brain, indicating shrinkage of the brain tissue. Additionally, research has found that depression is due to an imbalance of hormones and neurotransmitters. Viral infections are the final part of the biological approach to psychopathology, which suggests that some disorders are connected to viruses in utero.
Describe the different types of evidence used in evolutionary psychology and explain why evolutionary psychology needs to use a multi-method approach. The main types of evidence used to inform evolutionary psychology can be classed as external and internal. External evidence mainly consists of observation, measurement and analysis of how humans behave, to produce quantitative data. Whereas Internal evidence comprises reports by humans on there own behaviour, feelings and histories, to produce qualitative data. There can be some overlap between the two for example, conducting experiments on peoples behaviour in certain scenarios, recording their reactions but also offering them their feelings in each scenario.
Explain the principal psychological perspectives There are six psychological perspectives for health and social care, Behaviourist, Social learning, psychodynamic, Humanistic, Cognitive and Biological. In this booklet I will explain the principles of each perspective. Biological This theory underpins the key notion that our genes make us who are we; it also centres on a theory called ‘Maturation theory’ which suggest that out behaviour is biological and not environmental. They believe that genes are forwarded to individuals from their parents and that cognitive, physical and other development processes unfold over time depending on the genes and individual has rather than the environment they live in. The ‘Maturation theory’ believes development happens as a sequenced process, also stating that genes help is develop into the person we are meant to be.
Evaluate the biological explanation of dysfunctional behaviour (15) Neil Dizon The biological explanation of dysfunctional behaviour explains dysfunctional behaviour as being caused by various factors such as human evolution, genetic predispositions, as well as biochemical defects and imbalances in the nervous system. A strength of the biological explanation of dysfunctional behaviour is that it gives understanding to the nature versus nurture debate of behaviour. Using twin/adoption studies can easily show the relative influences of biology (i.e. genetics) and environment (i.e. child rearing) on an individual’s chances of developing dysfunctional behaviour.
Biological psychology is based on the psychological and neurological factors of what the brain is containing. Figuring out a certain brain reason for its behaviors either it me normal or mentally challenged, also known as a chemical imbalance in the brain for a person not to function correctly like a normal brain would. The studies that play in to this is behavioral, genetics and much more. 2. What is the historical development of biological psychology?
They suggest why some people are predisposed to phobias and why some phobias are more common than others. However the evidence used to support biological theories can often be used to support other alternative environmental explanations. Both theories attempt to explain and look to treat anxiety disorders although focusing on different aspect of treatment. When anxiety disorders are treated, the fact that often both treatments are simultaneously used suggests that there Evolutionary psychology (EP) is an approach in the social and natural sciences that examines psychological traits such as memory, perception, and language from a modern evolutionary perspective. It seeks to identify which human psychological traits are evolved adaptations – that is, the functional products of natural selection or sexual selection.
An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the two theories will follow. Finally, each approach will be discussed in respect to the agency-structure dualism. This dualism is concerned with individual ability to change and whether this is as a result of personal agency or social/biological structures. Trait theory was developed by Eysenck and Rachman (1965,cited in Butt,2007) and belongs to the mainstream, experimental approach to individual differences (Butt,2007). The aim of trait theory is to produce general principles of why people behave differently in different situations.