In Praise of Leisure

1267 Words6 Pages
What is the “good life?” No matter how hard one thinks about this question, there is no definitive answer. In “In Praise of Leisure,” Robert and Edward Skidelsky raise some ideas and questions regarding society's view of leisure and the pursuit of money. Using John Maynard Keynes' essay titled “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren” from 1930, in which Keynes predicted people in 100 years would be working less and relaxing more, they question the motivation behind people’s actions and assert that society seems to believe the only reason to do anything is for money. Why perform a task if that task does not make any money? Our culture's preoccupation with money is preventing creative and talented minds from following their dreams and passions, especially if their passion is in a creative career field for which monetary compensation may be limited or delayed. Obviously, money is a justifiable driving force behind any action, but it shouldn't be the exclusive reason that motivates someone to perform a task or a job. A society's view of the good life (money, money, and money) is not the only way to obtain a good and successful life. The “good life” is a life in which one looks forward to the next day, loves their family, cares for their friends, and shows respect to everyone. The good life should not only be defined in terms of achievement and accumulation, but is should also be viewed in terms of happiness and contentment. In regards to leisure, the Skidelsky brothers raise an interesting point. They are questioning a society's definition of leisure because people seem to mistake leisure for laziness. “Leisure, in the true, now almost forgotten sense of the word, is activity without extrinsic end” (18). Essentially, leisure is an enjoyable activity during which one does not feel stressed or pressured to earn a monetary reward. If one can find a career that

More about In Praise of Leisure

Open Document