With school uniforms it reduces distractions in school; therefore, students will get better education. Uniforms don’t only help the students to change their outside image, but also change their identity. It helps the children to see the importance of themselves, instead of their appearance. Students express their selves through their own personalities and attitude. We often feel less social pressure when everyone in the school dresses the same way.
How about the influence of the teacher? Suppose it just so happened that the teacher in the small class is much better than the teacher in the large class and this is the reason why the students in the smaller class did well. The 'type of teacher' becomes an intervening variable because it was an important factor that was not initially considered by the researcher. Suppose that there were two different types of books used or two different types of curricula used? Suppose it just so happens that the students in the small class happen to be smarter than those in the large class?
Some of the dictionaries support this idea, for example, Merriam-Webster define intelligence as a “Factor that is possible to gain or improve by hard work and experience”. Predicting a person’s intelligence is possible by his ability to solve problems in different kind of fields, such as, math, art science, music. However, intelligent people should also be able to show ability of fitting in the community and communication with others. A difference between an intelligent and a high achieving person is that an intelligent person does not have to apply as much effort into work due to his an ability to learn faster. A person who applies a lot of effort might not achieve as much as an intelligent person because he is only able to apply the knowledge he gained, but not use it to prove or investigate something new.
Students can focus more on learning and doing extracurricular activities because they do not have to worry about homework as much as before. No stress on students because parents will not put pressure on them for “good” grades. People argue that it differentiates the great students from the average for colleges. But it is possible for colleges and universities to base their admissions mainly on tests such as the SATs and ACTs and also base it on their efforts on extracurricular activities. Grades may show the students’ effort in school.
Furthermore, Forman concluded that a variety of methods are needed for concentration. The third peer interaction is Peer Tutoring. this is when more advanced learners teach material to less advanced individuals. Brainerd shows traditional learning is often more effective with student compared with individual learning. It has been found that peer tutoring is often best when the tutor is only slightly older than the student, as the material will be fresher in the tutors mind and the student will not feel so intimidated by their tutor.
When someone has learning orientation, building competence is deemed more important than demonstrating competence. Someone that shows high levels of learning orientation is more likely to choose an extremely difficult class because these types of people enjoy working on new things, and even if they fail, they see it as a learning experience and gain knowledge from that failure. Research has showed that a learning goal orientation improves self-confidence, as well as many other things. The other dimension was performance-prove. On this section I scored an 18, which was also considered above average.
As opposed Single sex schools unlike coed schools are more supportive academically, the competition between sexes is lowered , and students discover their character and develop their intellect. In a single-sex environment students feel more free to take chances with their ideas and most importantly disregard the label that
Hard work is something learned through being challenged and if a child is not challenged in their early years of education they will typically slack off in their high school and college years when hard work becomes key to success. The intelligent person doesn't have to work as hard to succeed because they'll use their intelligence to make the right choices & see connections that lead them to successful conclusions. But they do still have to work. An intelligent but lazy person could end up being equal to a less intelligent but hard working person. In general: Hard work + Intelligence = Very good grades.
In addition, critical thinking helps one to grasp ideas and change them so that they are even better than the original concepts. It also helps encourage analysis of such concepts. Hence, schools should encourage critical thinking. On the other hand, many students benefit from the more conventional ways of learning. Some university students believe that the traditional methods, such as copying off the blackboard, is a more sensible and effective way of learning, than thinking for yourself.
While female teachers may be more effective for kindergarten and primary school, in higher levels of education where studying gets more difficult, a powerful personality serves better for teaching. Also, the forcefulness helps students pay attention in class and reduces the chance of unproductive or disruptive behaviour. As previously explained, males through evolution are generally more assertive. The strictness creates an orderly learning environment and improves the learning opportunities in the class. In conclusion, males are better than females at teaching due to their senses of humour, competitive spirit, and strictness.