While it can be hard to understand why someone would falsely confess to a crime, psychological research has provided some answers and DNA exonerations have proven that the problem is more widespread than many people think. In approximately 25% of the wrongful convictions overturned with DNA evidence, defendants made false confessions, admissions or statements to law enforcement officials. In some false confession cases, details of the crime are inadvertently communicated to a suspect by police during questioning. Later, when a suspect knows these details, the police take the knowledge as evidence of guilt. Often, threats or promises are made to the suspect off camera and then the camera is turned on for a false confession.
After the questioner the police officer will have to build a case with the evidences gathered and send a case with the evidences to CPS (Crown Prosecution Services). Then CPS could state whether it’s enough evidences gathered to take the person to court or it can state that there is not enough evidences. That where it comes to the bail. (www.findlaw.co.uk) The bail can be granted or denied it all depends what is the offence and whether the person can be dangerous if goes back to the society/community. If the person is arrested on suspicious of the murder that would be clearly obvious that the person wouldn’t get the bail, as that person could try to run away also could attempt more murders or even self-harmed.
The criminal justice system relies heavily on eyewitness identification for investigating and prosecuting crimes in that, it may be the only evidence present for identifying criminals in certain cases (Wells & Olson, 2002). The strong weight given to eye witness identifications is nonetheless a matter of concern as it eye witness identifications have been demonstrated to be flawed, even when witness confidence is high. Experience has shown that the convincing and sincere witness can often be mistaken. Memon (2008) explains where eye-witness testimonies have been greatly unreliable; where Jean Charles de Menezes was shot by police as a result of mistaken identity. According to eye-witnesses he was described as suspicious, jumped over a ticket barrier and was wearing a wearing a bulky jack supposedly concealing a device.
Though they may have threatened to kill them. There must be evidence of a weapon in their possession that they intended to use for the crime. Doctrine of merger has been abandoned in many cases, because the defendant can be convicted of attempt or solicitation. If a defendant commits a single act
Why did Brooks knowingly lie about what Spradley said? “She had been beaten, and one of her eyes was bloodshot and swollen” (“Justia US Law, 2011) when she came into the police station earlier that year. Brooks may have thought that by making those false statements, it would give justice to what had happened to her, even though he may have been innocent of the charges currently filed against him. The third and final context to consider is criminal justice. This view is that sometimes the criminal justice system fails and non-law-abiding citizens get away with certain acts.
According to [ (Schmallager, 2009) ]”a crime is a violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government, or local jurisdiction, for which there is no acceptable legal justification or excuse”. A crime can consist of murder, theft, kidnapping, hijacking, assault and battery, conspiracy, and arson to name a few [ (Schmallager, 2009) ]. When the police are called to a crime they must locate and interview witnesses if possible, locate and hold possible suspects, find evidence, and try to find out what really happened to conclude if there is a crime or not. If the police determine a crime has taken place they will either make an arrest at the scene or have a judge issue an arrest warrant for the suspect(s). The arrest of the suspect(s) is a serious step as police believe they have enough evidence for the courts to convict the suspect.
Criminal Record can affect ones future in many ways, ways you wouldn’t even think of. I have done some research. If you are a convicted felon, it is sad to say that you will have great difficulty finding a job that will hire you. I mean, if you were the boss of a management, would you want a felon working for you? I wouldn’t.
This would typically include interviewing potential witnesses, determining what happened, and putting the pieces together. On an incident such as the Michael Brown slaying in St. Louis, witnesses couldn’t be taken as seriously as usual simply because of the uproar within the community. Any witness would automatically determine fault to be on the police officer. Investigators may read between the lines, though, often determining what truth is and what lies are. When video released of the Rodney King beating, South Central Los Angeles was
Others may think the exclusionary rule should not be used to enforce the Fourth Amendment. They feel at times it is necessary for the exclusionary rule to not be used. I can understand their position because they are looking at putting the accused defendant behind bars and make sure they are punished to the fullest. At times without the exclusionary rule, the case in court can succeed and get the result the prosecution and maybe even what the public want. Sometimes people feel the defendant has too many rights and has more benefits, which could help them get away with criminal activity.
Eyewitness accounts provide important evidence that may lead to the identification and arrest of criminal suspects. It is in the trial process that eyewitness testimony is most crucial and is most often correct. However, in some cases, mistaken identification may occur and lead to the wrong conviction of an innocent person. This is due to how the memory retains and processes information after being subjected to traumatic events. It is known that memory functions in different systems which consist of different sub units.