Diane might believe this is a wrongful termination because she is unreliable due excessive sick children. However, there has been no documentation to the matter or performance reviews that mention that she has been counseled on absenteeism. Greg on the other hand could believe that because he cannot work weekends due to religious reasons or disparate treatment he was let go. Cost Club is downsizing therefore, there will be no weekends work to perform or reasonable accommodations to be made on either side. Greg will not win the case based in religion discrimination.
Jones purchase the stock of Smithon outright leaving Smithon intact? The stock should not be purchase by Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones acquiring the assets, liabilities and also would inherit the contractual obligations of the selling corporation, would, be the results of the purchase. In lay terms, he has bought the existing Smithon Corporation and he is responsible of ensuring daily operations run efficiently but the tax aspect of acquisition he is responsible for existing and any future tax liabilities that the selling corporation had. It would be my advice for Mr. Jones to not buy the stock because of the liability of current and future tax obligations which Mr. Jones would incur from the purchase of the stock.
Armstrong’s failures to meet their obligation gives GCI three options: they may reject the entire shipment of goods, accept the shipment of goods as is, or accept any number of commercial units and reject the rest of the goods, (Melvin 2011, pg. 192). One right that is available to Armstrong is referred to as the cure. The cure is the UCC’s way of promoting the completion of an original contract. It would allow Armstrong (the seller) the right or opportunity to repair or replace any goods that the buyer (GCI) has rejected as long as the time period for performance has not
Social services should have removed Andy from her care because she could not care for him. I did not think they should have put him in the Los Angeles County because no child should be in a place like that. According to the textbook, Tower-Crosson, (2010). “Protective workers involved in the assessment process learn to ask specific question designed to assess the potential risk of the home situation to the child and the capacity of the parents to cope with child rearing. The interviewing process is an integral
Paula wanted to continue working for NewCorp but did not want to continue working under Sam, therefore she applied for a transfer to the wire-coating department. Sam blocked the transfer citing that because Paula could become pregnant that department would not be a good fit for her. By blocking the transfer Sam has now made NewCorp liable for discrimination charges under Title VII. Title VII make it unlawful for companies to discriminate against persons based on their sex. By not allowing the transfer based on the fact that the chemical used in this department could harm a fetus makes this disparate-treatment discrimination.
Nordstrom does not offer extensive training programs to its customers. Employees are paid on a commission basis, they are surrounded by a very competitive environment and it is ingrained in them that customer satisfaction is key. Employees needing to train new employees may not emphasize to the new employee why the need for customer satisfaction is so important. Also, because of the competitive environment, it may cause the employee to not train the new employee appropriately because of threat to their sales, which could in turn cause a misconception of their family environment. There is no training program for them that state any reasons why the culture of the company relies on customer satisfaction.
If I were a human resource manager, I would be ashamed and I would feel like I didn't do my job, and that I just ignored a safety issue that was serious. The lawsuit costed the company a lot money and I would be afraid that I would lose my job over the lawsuit. The courts verdict would affect me greatly and I would be ashamed to go back to work. Their was no explanation as to why the safety complaints were never investigated
Government intervention into the media is a hot topic these days, filled with controversy and blame. Every group is pointing the finger at another group. Parents are blaming the government for not helping, government is blaming the media for not censoring material, and others are blaming the parents for not censoring and protecting their children. Our society is getting nowhere. there is no solid proof that the media causes violence, and although parents do a lot to help and protect their children, there are still some steps that can be taken to protect their children against violent and sexual material.
In Chitra Divakarun's article Live Free and Starve, he compellingly asserts that we must stop this bill, which will ban imports from countries with child labors; from passing because it adversely affects the children it is supposed to help. The article discusses the benefits and repercussions of the stopping particular imports and then urges people that we must continue to import or risk hurting the children. This article has a persuasive and compelling tone, which attempts to accomplish the author’s goal by convincing the reader of the repercussions of banning imports from these countries. The author provides a personal anecdote, which enables the reader to relate to an experience emotionally, pointing out fallacies in opposing arguments,
If I had a young child attending Jane Elliot's class in the second grade I wouldn't want them to undergo the experiment. I think that a child's mind is not strong enough and this might scar them emotionally and mess with their ego. I think parents definitely have the right to determine whether or not their child participates in this experiment. I think it is unlawful that they do the experiment without a parental consent. The pain that the children may experience is not worth the lessons they may learn from the project.