If Shakespeare Had A Sister

590 Words3 Pages
Alexandra “If Shakespeare Had a Sister” Virginia Woolf grew up facing many prejudices against educated women. As a result of her desire to be well educated, she took personal offense at the tradition of putting down women educated beyond the social norms. Shakespeare’s sister or any other woman would not have been able to rise to his status and maintain her sanity in the face of the rejection, denial and disapproval that would result from the attempt. The use of example is a tool Woolf uses well to demonstrate her points and exhibit her knowledge of classical texts and critical writing skills. One of Woolf’s supports for her essay was that she discusses the everyday life of a woman so far as she has been to piece it together from the few reports she has been able to recover of that time; complaining that there is not nearly enough information on the period only supports her claims. Comparing that research to the life of a woman in Shakespeare’s plays, it is easy to see that Shakespeare exaggerated just a little about the importance, intelligence and treatment of women. She observes that “Imaginatively she is of the highest importance; practically she is completely insignificant.” (Woolf, 23) “For genius like Shakespeare’s is not born among laboring, uneducated, servile people.” (Woolf, 24) Generally Woolf prefers to reference those classics like Poe and of course Shakespeare, but her primary source for her essay was Professor Trevelyan’s History of England. She really enforces that this is an expert evaluation by using Professor Trevelyan’s book and others opinions, like the anonymous bishop, as evidence or at least clarity. She evaluates all corners of the woman’s life, (education, parenting, travelling etc.) to conclude that “it would have been impossible, completely and entirely, for any woman to have written the plays of Shakespeare in the age of
Open Document