If you shoot once you are almost guaranteed not to get another shot on that same deer, it takes way longer for an archer to reload his bow then it would for a gunman to reload his gun for a second shot. That raises the challenge level so much more to put a good shot on it because there may not be that second chance. If using a bow you will agree that the challenge is so much great with a bow then it is with a gun. Although presented with all of this information one would think that bow hunting is the ultimate challenge. Have so much adrenaline you cant stop your body from shaking, the thrill of shooting something within 30 yards and gaining that different type of respect for that animal, and the challenge of getting that perfect shot on it because you know that there may not be another shot.
Clocking my friend in without her being there is very much the same thing as stealing from the business and it would have been extremely morally wrong. Besides the fact that I am a virtuous person, I still follow the values that are meaningful in having and by implementing this terrible act; I would have became a hypocrite of what I’ve believed in my entire life. I believe that what I do to others is how I want others to do to me, but this situation was calling for me to break the things that I believe in so
A person hunting for deer may see another person but mistake them for a deer and unintentionally shoot and kill that person. With more severe gun control laws people do not have to be worried about being the innocent by standard. People will be kept safe from accidental
If I could create a new law it would be no texting or calling while driving. Texting while driving can be very dangerous, and has already resulted in the deaths and injuries of countless numbers of drivers. Calling while driving has also had many of the same results as texting while driving which is why I think that should not be allowed as well. This new law should be passed because drivers will be less distracted, it could save many lives, and it would be safer for everyone. Texting or calling while driving can be one of the most dangerous distractions, and the could both lead to death or injury.
Why would a criminal follow gun control laws if he or she is already going to break the law to commit a crime? The gun control laws will be only hurting the law abiding citizens that enjoy using their gun rights for sport such as hunting. Gun control laws will be only taking away a form of protection that some people desperately need. Gun Control laws will only tear this country more apart and create more conflict between Democrats and Republicans. The United States Government needs to allow citizens to keep their rights and protection and live the way Americans have lived for the past two hundred
The connection between the hunt inside and outside of the castle is obvious, Gawain acts just like the deer. He tries to avoid a confrontation with the Lady much like the dear avoids confrontation with Bercilak. “And laid his head low again in likeness of sleep”. (Lines 1190) Sir Gawain does not want to offend the Lady but he also does not want to break his knightly code and appeal to her wishes. Any behavior that could be considered an insult to the Lord of the house would break his knightly code.
Mainly, people who have suffered the loss of a loved one in those events are asking that there be school safety and the gun control law passed. For the reasons that they don’t want those events to take place again and have the reminder and thought of another family losing someone. Then there are the others who think that it is too much money spent and schools can’t afford the hiring of student resource officers along with them opposing the gun control law being passed. By which they oppose the gun control law because they spend their spare time out hunting or in a range. All of this has been a controversy in our nation and will continue because we all have different perspective on this topic.
For example people would say its correct and fair to kill a murderer, because they've taken someone's life so in punishment theirs should be taken too. On the other hand relativism isn't so good as one person could be favoured over another so the more vulnerable people will find it hard to stand up for what they think is right. Theological take a relativist view however they will say what would be the consequenence of the action taken? they look at what the outcome will be for example if a mother stole for the benefit of her children eating that day they would suggest that the thought behind it was to save her children however the action was morally
They also carried weapons on them for protection against Indians or wildlife that lived all around them. There was also some thought about over-regulation weapons; however, to most people this in a breach in the 1st Amendment. From what I gathered I believe we should regulate more regularly. If we keep hounding people with tax and registration on weapons they will become tiresome and just want to give up their weapons and overall will lower the crime rate of accidents with weapons involved. The last dozen or so attacks have been involved with teenagers or young adults with medical issues, now if we had a more serious approach on issuing licenses to legitimate people I believe we can lower the crime rate with weapons in our
Now if we create more gun control laws which make it harder for civilians to get home defense guns then its just putting more people lives in danger. Essentially, making it easy for bad people to do things like that. Not only will gun laws make it less affordable to obtain guns but it will also make the whole process of get them a lot harder. See as of right now guns don't need to be registered you could simply go to a gun show or just over to your neighbor's house and buy a gun! Which is one thing this whole gun control thing might be helpful for, but at the same time it will make it a huge hassle to buy self defense or home defense buyers to get