Humor in Tragedy

935 Words4 Pages
In John Morreall’s “Humor in the Holocaust: Its Critical, Cohesive, and Coping Functions”, Morreall analyzes the peculiar relationship of tragedy and humor. Morreall states, “Tragedy, on stage or in real life, is serious, even sublime, while humor and comedy are ‘light’. In drama, when comedy appears within tragedy, it is usually discounted as mere ‘comic relief’.” He further examines the role comic relief as it pertains to the Holocaust. Morreall criticizes Western culture’s “prejudice against humor” in connection to tragic events. He points out that earlier dramatists, such as the ancient Greeks and Shakespeare, did not view humor as discourteous to the “real world, rather as a perspective on that world.” In addition, Morreall asserts that humor, in relation to tragedy, has three distinct functions: critical, cohesive and coping. In a time where tragedy is so prevalent throughout the world, humor’s functions, as described by Morreall, are still applicable. In the case of Hurricane Katrina, comic relief serves a vehicle to criticize the government’s actions, and also provides a coping mechanism for everyone affected by the tragedy. Hurricane Katrina slammed into the U.S. Gulf Coast on Aug. 29, 2005, destroying beachfront towns in Mississippi and Louisiana, displacing a million people, and killing almost 1,800. When levees in New Orleans were breached, 80% of the city was submerged by the flooding.About 20% of its 500,000 citizens were trapped in the city without power, food, or drinking water. Rescue efforts were so delayed and haphazard that many were stranded for days on rooftops and in attics before help arrived. The city became a toxic pool of sewage, chemicals, and corpses, and in the ensuing chaos, mayhem and looting became rampant. Approximately 15% of the city's police force had simply walked off the job. The 20,000 people who made their way to the
Open Document