This movie is about a mission similar to the Apollo’s where several astronauts are ready to take off to space, but there was a problem with the rocket so they had to fake it to make the public believe. All this to make a few billion dollars. Of course, this is just a movie and does not necessarily means that it reflects reality…but what it reflects does make the Apollo missions seem like a hoax and it reinforces the idea even though it is just a film. As time goes on, many analysis were
People should not be allowed to own property in space because it can be expensive, it would cause conflict, and space colonization is not yet possible. Owning property in space can empty your bank account! It cost about $36 billion to create the prototype rocket and start the program. This money could be used for more important things, such as health care and helping people who are not financially stable. When space colonization becomes a more regular event,
They considered the orbiter a reusable as a means for long-run cost savings. The budget would have needed to be ten times more than what it actually was. In what ways was the incident an “accident” and in what ways were they a result of negligence? The Challenger could be considered an accident due to the cold weather and that no one actually knew that the O-ring would fail. But on the other hand, the mission was postponed due to unfavorable weather, and despite the fact that some engineers did not want to go ahead with the launch, the go ahead was given.
Is Pluto a Planet?? Recently, Pluto has become a topic of controversy and discussion among scientists, students, and the public. However there are always two sides to a story and the debate as to whether or not Pluto should be classified as a planet or not is no exception. Due to the unclear and confusing definition of which objects floating around in space can truly be classified as planets, Pluto has been a hot topic. When looking at how planets were classified at the time of Pluto’s discovery technology was much different.
This may not seem important now, but at the time both countries were conducting top-secret nuclear research and while they did not want to publicly reveal their progress, they did want to project the message to the world that—whatever progress they had made—it was better and farther along than the progress of their enemies. NASA’s space program became the United State’s poster-child of our technological achievement and, as such, it also became a tool of international intimidation and of national defense. When the Challenger Space Shuttle exploded over Cape Canaveral in 1986, it was like a giant sign flashing overhead that the US was not as capable and powerful as previous thought. President Ronald Reagan acted quickly in speaking to the country about the tragedy, but his aim was not simply to reassure the public that everything was okay. In his Challenger speech, President Reagan persuaded the American public to continue to support the space program through his appeal to traditional American values of exploration and discovery, national pride, and national unity.
Again another human error that could have been avoided that saved seven lives that changed many families. Human error of either laziness or over looking the simply thinking in technical mission is what showed up to cause disaster. The challenger disaster remained everyone why its important to take great detail in what we do in our lives. NASA and the government have implicated more stringent regulations on NASA and individual workers. Inspections have also become more detailed and
What will happen to the universe in the future? Is there life on other planets? These are just some of the questions to which mankind tries to answer. But it needed all this research? Do we spend too much money for this research To understand life on Earth we must first understand the space.
Technology becoming out of hand for the future In the article “Why the future doesn’t need us” by Bill Joe (2000) states that in the future the world is not going to need us. He continues his argument by stating that computers are being created to do the jobs of humans, but a lot better, which leaves many people out of jobs. As of now there is not an industry that uses a computer to do daily work. Computers do make work more efficient, but knowing that humans may be voluntary to give up power to a machine. If humans do give up power to machines they may be capable of making all of our decisions for us.
In fact, so many people are focused on not failing, that they don’t really aim for success. To this success driven society, failure isn’t just considered not an option, it is deemed a deficiency. “It is our meta-mistake: We are wrong about what it means to be wrong. Far from being a sign of intellectual inferiority, the capacity to err is crucial to human cognition (K. Schulz)”. When we actually take the time to think about all of the great thinkers throughout history, failure isn’t a new or extraordinary thing at all.
However many people believe these hypotheses are not merely science fiction, but a weather forecast. The truth of the matter is there’s no predicting how robots will behave when they have thoughts and minds of their own as well as their human-surpassing intelligence. The Singularity is truly a frightening thought. But it is worth noting that the Singularity might not even be possible. The power of our current hardware might be ten orders in magnitude less than the power of the brain.