The current alternative to the fee-for-services is the capitation arrangement. The physicians believe that the pay-for-performance is controlling how that he or she conducts the practice, but it will eliminate many expensive and unnecessary procedures (Shi & Singh, 2012).The pay-for-performance in the United States healthcare industry comes after the capitation and managed care and if managed correctly will become an asset and if not it will become a major blunder. The goal of pay-for-performance is to change patient behavior and doctors and hospitals with a rewards systems or punishment. A pay-for-performance bonus for doctors can be an increase for the general fee-for-service hospitals can receive an extra in the form of the diagnosis group-based payment (Shi & Singh,
I was not aware that several individuals were not obtaining the care they require for the reason they could not pay for it and couldn’t find insurance. The biggest influence is the health care price, health care entrance, and the consequences from it (Wood, R., 2009, p. 1). I’ve knowledge that breaking the HIPAA policies can result in punishment along with the government laws. Role of Technology Technology will perform a big position in the medical business from security, new services ideas and diagnosing patients, contacting patients and keeping touch. It will assist to make sure the obedience in the legal condition of health care and it will assist to decreased the costs and provide a superior care than before (Finnegan, 2012) Technology will assist with more communication services, electronic medical records, and more computers doctors order entry solutions and many more things than before (Finnegan, 2012).
There will be no limitations on the dollar amount of coverage a patient can have. The most important factor of this law is making care more affordable for everyone and for those who cannot afford the cost of coverage. They will be able to buy through some form of exchange. As for small businesses, they will receive a tax credit increase for offering health insurance (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2013).
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal government does not have the right to make it mandatory for people to have to buy health insurance from a private company. However, it does have the right to tax those that don't. The Court struck down the idea that states people must add people to Medicaid. However, many states will still take advantage of this portion of Obama Care because the Federal government will not take the bill away until it as shown negative effects. So until the Federal government takes it away states will take advantage of gaining extra money from taxes being paid from those who don’t invest into getting health insurance.
My views on science and technology in the healthcare industry are kind of hard to express, because on some aspects it’s a good thing, to have new more advanced equipment, and new science discoveries in cures for some diseases, but on the negative aspect of things, you have new technological equipment, but no one trained to run the equipment, it has increased the pricing in medical care, but I see that some people cannot afford insurance due to the rising costs of medical insurance, we also need to make sure that your doctors, nurses, specialists, and anyone else who is in the healthcare field are properly trained, you can’t just put someone out there who has no experience and expect them to know what they are doing…that is just like coming to your own funeral, it just cannot
My theory also is that eventually people will start bidding on artificial organs and the richer people will have say over a family that doesn't have a lot of money. If doctors wanted to replace original organs with artificial ones, it would take a lot of perfecting and obligating a clean bill of health for the patient. Who, if anyone, should be a prime candidate for these types of artificial/synthetic replacements? Do you feel that anyone should have access to them? Even a life-long smoker or alcoholic who knowingly subjected themselves to harmful substances?
Abstract In recent years, healthcare leaders and medical experts have expressed concerns about tough challenges ahead for healthcare and its leaders. While most agree that the issue warrants attention, consensuses divide around how to respond to the problem. The purpose of this paper is to summarize, explore and analyze Dr. Kyle Glazier’s article on Ronald G. Spaeth’s philosophies on healthcare, and examine Spaeth’s authority on business and healthcare through his education and works. His business theories in management branch from a human relations approach which accounts for much of his success in healthcare to express his methods. He states that healthcare institutions have shifted more like running a business and those young healthcare
MDMA should be reviewed and rescheduled due to the fact that the initial scheduling reports were flawed, there are vast medical uses for MDMA in treating patients who have shown no improvements with other psychological treatments, and there is a very low possibility of death amongst users of unadulterated MDMA. Why must we withhold a drug that can be so very useful for the treatment of extreme mental conditions and possibly cure thousands of Americans of their
As for whether slashing military spending would deny us needed protection, one could as well ask whether we are safe today with policies that risk "blowback”, bankruptcy, and monetary disarray. All through the debate over health-care reform last year, I cast a somewhat jaundiced eye on those critics who said the United States could not afford it, because frequently those critics also seemed to be supporters of the Iraq war. Their thrift seemed to stop at the war’s edge. They said we could not afford health care, when we plainly could afford it, given our outlandish spending on a war of choice, to say nothing of a Wall Street bailout. $700 billion for the war.
This is not a good situation, It shows that the reforms won't fundamentally change the run away pace of US health spending, including both public, and private sector's money With or without reform, the overall US medical bill will account for about 21 percent of gross domestic product in 2019, or 3 percentage points higher than today, according to a recent analysis done within the Health and Human Services Department. Mr. Obama's critics say his plan will follow a familiar pattern seen since the introduction of Medicare in the 1960s. Extend a new entitlement without clear cost control mechanisms and that will result in spendings that exceeds expectations. If this is the case, "entitlement" may not be the right word. But the government will be expanding medicaid to millions of families just above the poverty line, and extending subsidies to help millions more with the mandate to buy