They don’t tell the story from the victim’s point of view. 1. According to Zinn, what is his main purpose for writing A People’s History of the United States? Answer: According to ZInn, he wanted to write a history book that told the truth. He claims that history books today leave out details and the truth behind what really happened.
The Grapes of Wrath has been publicly accepted as a reflection of society in that time period. It includes many interactions between the two main groups at the moment, the older group, known as the Lost Generation and the GIs. One of the most heated debates among historians and sociologists has been whether or not the Greatest Generation was as noble and ethical as it has come to be known. Members of that generation are those born after 1902 all the way to those who were old enough to fight in World War II. Several authors have expressed their opposing viewpoints in their book chapters and essays.
They examine questions in regards to research such as individual actions, civilizations, social structures, and regions. Sometimes this causes debates among historians by giving different viewpoints on an event. It’s similar to a political debate, in a debate you have conservative and liberal viewpoints. Historians can have different viewpoints of how a historical event occurred. For instance Christopher Columbus has been portrayed as a great discover by some historians but by Zinn he is portrayed as a tyrant.
Source 8 does not support this view, however the only evidence supporting it being that tensions between Nationalists and Unionists was high and that because of their differences Ireland was preparing for a Civil War, as suggested by source 7. Source 8 is also a relatively modern book and so, like source 7, could be argued to carry more weight. On the other hand source 9 is a speech made by Andrew Bonar Law, a key unionist of the time, and therefore could be considered biased and not as reliable as the other sources.
Every past event is not just the text in books, there probably would never be a completed record. Sometimes, the so called “official records” could be just a small part of the fact or fake. So history, rather than retelling story from the documents, is the act of selecting, analyzing, and drawing a relatively accurate portrayal of the fact. I guess this is the main idea that the authors are trying to make for us, and this is also the case with Silas Deane's life and death. Silas Deane was a minor American diplomat to France.
5. What is Zinn’s basic criticism of historian Samuel Eliot Morison’s book, Christopher Columbus, Mariner? Zinn states in his book," One can lie about the past. Or one can omit facts which might lead to unacceptable conclusion. Morison does neither."
The Great Rhetra and the speculation behind when it first came into existence When examining the Great Rhetra to ascertain what it is and when it first came into existence, the issue we face as historians and scholars is determining whom we should believe in terms of both modern and ancient scholars. Determining what the Great Rhetra was and what its purpose was is fairly straightforward; however, the same cannot be said for determining its exact origin. Due to the conflicting accounts from ancient scholars, modern historians are left to decipher when they believe the Great Rhetra truly came into existence. Through the examination of ancient scholars and primary evidence, modern scholars are able to shed greater light on this document and aid in our examination of what the Great Rhetra is, and what the origins of this document were. In studying the Great Rhetra and when it came into existence, we must first understand what it was and look at who created it.
The Great Rhetra and the speculation behind when it first came into existence When examining the Great Rhetra to ascertain what it is and when it first came into existence, the issue we face as historians and scholars is determining whom we should believe in terms of both modern and ancient scholars. Determining what the Great Rhetra was and what its purpose was is fairly straightforward; however, the same cannot be said for determining its exact origin. Due to the conflicting accounts from ancient scholars, modern historians are left to decipher when they believe the Great Rhetra truly came into existence. Through the examination of ancient scholars and primary evidence, modern scholars are able to shed greater light on this document and aid in our examination of what the Great Rhetra is, and what the origins of this document were. In studying the Great Rhetra and when it came into existence, we must first understand what it was and look at who created it.
Study of History: The Battle of Gettysburg The study of history is categorized as a social science. As such it cannot be regarded as an exact science in which hypotheses can be proven unequivocally with empirical evidence. Instead historians rely on as much evidence in the form of primary, and secondary when necessary, sources as possible in order to validate their hypotheses. Unfortunately, unlike empirical evidence, this historical evidence is vulnerable to the personal and cultural biases of both the original authors and the historians analyzing it. A prime example of a historical event subject to contradictory accounts is the Battle of Gettysburg.
War in Iraq My political knowledge is essentially non-existent. I have discovered the more I learn about our government and its actions the less I wish I knew. My limited political knowledge comes mainly from the sensationalized and biased mainstream media. When approaching this paper I was directed towards a book, Fiasco, written by Thomas E. Ricks. I worked individually on my paper to research the topic of the war in Iraq and more specifically, President Bush’s policy on this topic.