How Would a ‘Sociological Imagination’ Help You Understand a Seemingly Individualistic Act Such as Suicide?

1421 Words6 Pages
The sociological imagination enables us to understand the larger historical scene in terms of its meaning for the inner life and the external career of a variety of individuals. It allows us to take into account how individuals, in the welter of their daily experience, often become falsely conscious of their social positions. The sociological enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society.(c wright mills, 1959). According to Durkheim, traditional cultures experienced a high level of social and moral integration, there was little individuation, and most behaviors were governed by social norms, which were usually embodied in religion. By taking part in the same activities and rituals, people in traditional societies shared common moral values,which Durkheim called a collective conscience. In traditional societies, people tend to regard themselves as members of a group; the collective conscience embraces individual awareness, and there is little sense of personal options.(Elwell, Frank W., 2003,) Suicide was an action that was widely perceived as one of the most intensely individual acts, one that is purely determined by psychological and biographical factors. However,Durkheim insisted that the study of society must not rely on psychological factors alone (reductionism). Rather, social phenomenon must be considered as a different class or level of fact. To demonstrate the power of these social facts in determining human behavior, Durkheim studied suicide. Suicide was an action that was widely perceived as one of the most intensely individual acts, one that is purely determined by psychological and biographical factors. It is simply impossible, Durkheim insisted, to explain or interpret the characteristics and behaviors of human groups on a psychological or biological basis. Much of who and what we are, of how we behave
Open Document