How the Law Should Respond to Hacktivism

1075 Words5 Pages
How should the law respond to Hactivism. By the definition, Hacktivism is merely a specific definition of the more widely used term “ Hacker”. A hactivist is a user who engages in hacker activities for a certain reason or goal: Protesting corporate or political policies. Unlike the well-known term of a hacker, they have a certain goal in mind when hacking a person or an interest on the web. They break into computer systems, frequently with intentions to alter or modify existing settings. Sometimes nasty in nature, hacking may cause damage or disruption to computer systems or networks. "Unauthorized access" involves approaching, trespassing , communicating with, storing data in, retrieving data from, or otherwise intercepting and changing computer resources without consent. The goals created by these people are negative and range from accessing and downloading data from corporate servers to defacing a public website. Hactivism is strictly confined to negatively-orientated goals due to the legal and right implications’ that come of controlling private information. Hacktivist activities span many political ideals and issues, according to the Criminal Code Act Division (477-478) plans the serious computer crimes such as hacking, it can be prosecuted at the federal level. Division 477.1 of the Criminal code acts states: (1) A person guilty of the offence is someone whom causes the unauthorised access to data in a computer, modified data or impairment of electronic communication to or from a computer. The unauthorised access, modification or impairment is caused by the means of a carriage service and the person knows the access, the person whether they intend to commit enable the commission of a serious offence such as hacking into any government system or business against the law or state is a guilty offence, trials are relying on the act being committed on

More about How the Law Should Respond to Hacktivism

Open Document