How Important Was the Role of Anti Slavery Campaigners in the Abolition of Slavery in the British Empire

1542 Words7 Pages
How important was the role of anti- slavery campaigners in the abolition of slavery in the British Empire in 1833? AS Essay - Rohan Shah 9C - Wilsons School The trade triangle was vital to the continuation of slavery till 1833. Ships from British ports, like Bristol and Manchester, and other European Countries would sail down from Britain, carrying textiles, metal goods and guns to West Africa. There slave dealers, mainly tribe chiefs, would capture people from other tribes or POW’s they had captured, and swap them for the goods. From here, British ships would carry them to the Caribbean on ships (known as the Middle Passage) where they would be sold and forced to work on plantations. Slaves were considered properly so would get treated very poorly on the journey to the Caribbean, and on the plantations. Punishments for stepping out of line ranged from hours on a treadmill, to various limbs being burnt off. The goods they produced (sugar, spices, cotton) would be taken on ships back to Britain and sold there. As the slaves worked for free, the goods would cost less for the British. I believe that slavery was abolished due to the fact it became inefficient (other factors), rather than the role of anti-slavery camritain paigners. I believe that the weaker interpretation is that the role of anti slavery campaigners was more important than other factors in the abolition of slavery. For example, William Wilberforce was an MP for Yorkshire and introduced bills in Parliament for 18 years to abolish slavery. The first time he introduced a bill, he lost the debate 163 to 88 as many other MP’s made a fortune off the slave trade indirectly. Eventually in 1807, the trading of slaves was banned in the British Empire but those that were enslaves were not emancipated. Finally , the brilliant speeches and his hard work paid off in 1833, when slaves were finally
Open Document