How Important Was Haig Compared To Lloyd George In

863 Words4 Pages
How important was Haig compared to Lloyd George in achieving Allied victory in World War One? General Haig was put in charge of Brittan’s army on December 1916 during the First World War. The coalition government formed but with David Lloyd George who became the Prime Minister during the First World War and was in charge of the munitions. Haig was in charge of some of the biggest battles during the war such as Passchendaele, and The Battle of the Somme. Lloyd George was highly popular amongst the British public. Like Haig, Lloyd George was determined on winning the war, but he made lots of sensible choices, unlike Haig who made very little. Lloyd George was a very intelligent boy, and after finishing school he decided to study law and became a solicitor. Source A is a picture of a British tank from World War One. The British was the only side to use tanks for most of the war. The only tanks that the opposition used were the ones they had captured from to British or their own versions that they made towards the end of the First World War. Lloyd George was one of the people who wanted the tanks to be used, and was one of the people responsible for then use of the tanks, and this change of tactics. Lloyd George is therefore rather important compared to Haig on Brittan’s victory. Source C is Haig’s views on the first day of The Battle of the Somme. On the first day of the Somme Haig lost 20,000 men, and there were 60,000 casualties. He put “The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists.” When he said this I don’t think he meant 60,000 casualties. There were 500,000 casualties in The Battle of the Somme and yet Haig didn’t think to change his tactics once. This is the sort of reason and possibly the main reason why Haig was known as “The Butcher.” However he was determined to win the war and that is what he did. Lloyd George also refused to accept the
Open Document