How Far Was the First World War Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1917?

1608 Words7 Pages
How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Mikhail Romanov founded the Romanov dynasty in 1613, when a national assembly unanimously elected him Tsar of Russia. However, in 1917, the rule of the Romanovs came to an abrupt end, as Tsar Nicholas II abdicated. Anti-government soldiers, who had gained control of the line, so that he could attempt to take control over the strikes and demonstrations that had gripped the city, stopped his train, on its way to Petrograd. The Tsar was then visited by members of the State Duma and asked to abdicate, which he did, and which he did on behalf of his hemophiliac son, Alexei. The First World War was without a doubt an important factor that contributed to this decision. The First World War was responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs in four main ways. Firstly, the loss of agricultural workers and horses to the army, combined with the takeover of railway lines by the army, led to food shortages in towns and cities due to poor internal communications. Moscow, for example, had been receiving 2,200 railway wagons of grain per month in 1914, but by Christmas 1916, this figure was down to around 300 wagons. There wasn’t enough food to feed the people of Russia – and to make matters worse, rationing was in place, under which each person got a mere 50g of bread per day. This resulted in the people of Russia becoming agitated and taking part in the strikes and demonstrations in Petrograd, which led to the abdication of the Tsar. Secondly, the First World War crippled the Russian economy. The country mobilized 5.3 million men in 1914, and, by Christmas 1916, 15.3 million men had experienced military service. The cost of fighting the war and of maintaining such a large armed force put great strains on the economy; the National Budget, for example, rose eightfold between 1913 and 1916,
Open Document