How Far Was Foreign Policiy the Most Important Factor in the Failure of the 1621 Parliament?

674 Words3 Pages
How far was foreign policy the most important factor in the failure of the 1621 Parliament? (24 marks) The 1621 Parliament of James I’s reign was mostly conducted in harmony and demonstrated the ability, however rare, of the monarch and the Commons working together towards a common goal. However, discussion over foreign policy led to a breakdown in relations, and ended in the dissolution of the Parliament. James I had summoned the 1621 Parliament to raise funds for a potential war with Spain. Parliament were initially enthusiastic, saying to James “take your sword in your hand… direct the point of your sword at Spain”. However, due to James’ continued good relations with Spain, Parliament were reluctant to grant James the huge sums of money necessary for war, and hence voted him a mere subsidy of roughly £140,000 which was woefully inadequate for the purpose that it was intended. However Parliament had every right to be suspicious, as James had placed 2500 troops on the continent, but actually forbidden them to fight and was continuing his negotiations with Spain. James felt that the Spanish Match should be used as a tool to restore Frederick to the Palatinate, and this would allow him to avoid military intervention. The King, however, neglected to mention this to his Parliament who became understandably confused and wary due to the carelessness of James and his lack of communication. Discussion at the Parliament then moved to domestic grievances; most importantly the issue of monopolies, which were bitterly opposed by the vast majority of Parliamentarians. Here James and the Commons worked in unison, a rare event at this time. The revival of impeachment by Coke and Cranfield to remove Bacon, who was heavily involved with monopolies, was allowed by James as he was eager to maintain the positive relations he was enjoying with his Parliament. James and the Commons
Open Document