In theory a Prime Minister is Primus Inter Paras, he has a wide range of powers such as chairing the cabinet, appointing ministers and controlling the armed forces. A Prime Minister only holds the roll because they are a leader of a party. Issues such as policy disagreements and how to remove a Prime Minister will be discussed but ultimately it will be noted that currently the Liberal Democrats limit Cameron more than his own party. A party can remove a Prime Minister from their role as Prime Minister. This can be seen when looking at the two most powerful Prime Ministers in the post war era; Thatcher and Blair were in differing ways removed from their parties.
Eventually, after von Schleicher resigns, Hitler is made Chancellor after von Papen persuades Hindenburg. Von Papen thought that as long as there were a limited number of Nazis in the cabinet then Hitler could be controlled. Von Papen was wrong. Also there was the weakness of the Weimar
Eventually, after von Schleicher resigns, Hitler is made Chancellor after von Papen persuades Hindenburg. Von Papen thought that as long as there were a limited number of Nazis in the cabinet then Hitler could be controlled. Von Papen was wrong. Once you let Hitler in, it’s nigh-on impossible to get him out again. Also there was the weakness of the Weimar government, which played its part in
How far do you agree with the view that in the years 1933-39, Hitler was a ‘weak dictator’? As Source 5 states, ‘Hitler can be said to have been a ‘weak dictator.’ Much historical debate surrounds the view of whether he can be considered a powerful leader. He was arguably dependent on his own popularity, with his indecisiveness and government inaction being a consequence of this. The chaotic structure of the Nazi Party also illustrates the weaknesses he faced as a dictator. However, as shown in Source 6, Hitler was a ‘central figure’ and thus can be considered a strong leader.
Then on the 7th of April he created a new form of regional government run by Nazi officials. However, there is a counter argument as although his party got 43.1% of the votes, 56.9% didn’t like or vote for Hitler. This shows he didn’t have the backing many people thought he did. However, there are other strong arguments such as the
* * 2. What are at least two opinions presented by each side of the critical issue? * * Cotton and Devilly stress that Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) is not explained properly and research has proven that CISD does not give patients the results needed. * Devilly and Cotton also stated that Critical incident stress management (CISM) is also not properly explained in the treatment of traumatized individuals, which makes the process ineffective (Halgin, 2007). * Mitchell’s opinion is that Devilly and Cotton display a lack of knowledge within the text of CISM because no reference to this literature is stated by the authors.
I do believe that he put thought into this but this is not music, there is no expression in this. I believe this piece contains little creativity, this however says nothing about his ability to write and compose but it is simply an opinion. Perhaps if the piece would contain a succession of tones and sounds it would fall in the category of music. If I would have experienced this for the first time in person, I might
The gradual ascendance of the three revolutions ended in a failure of a third one, but Woolridge and Micklethwait seem to overly stress the faults of second revolution and third. The first revolution was that of Leviathan, the game-changing document that made Hobbes seem like a “dangerous egalitarian”, establishing a social contract by the people in which “parliament could be as effective as a king and that the essence of Leviathan lay in the nation state rather than in family territories..” (32), with the sovereign governing “with a light touch as if strained..by a constitutional order (Woolridge and Micklethwait 33). The next piece of history was simply that,
U.S. government-funded antitrafficking projects often lack some important elements that allow projects to be monitored, and little is known about project impact due to difficulties in conducting evaluations. At the international level, the legal
As a result, Selim II (known by some as "Selim the Drunkard"), became the next Sultan, despite the fact that he had lived a relatively secluded life in the palace and did not have experience in running the government.3 He was overly fond of physical pleasures and did not take seriously his governing responsibilities. After him, the Sultanate continued to decline. One of the causes of this was that the possible successors of the Sultan, such as the Sultan's brothers, were confined in the harem, where they became lazy and incompetent.4 Another cause was the Sultans' desertion of the tradition of training their sons in government and related affairs.5 In the end, the degeneration in the Sultanate played a significant role in the decline of the Ottoman Empire. Among the results of the decline of the Sultanate was the weakening of the central government's control over the empire. Significant sections of the empire began to operate more or less autonomously.6 And the central government itself became fraught with strife and conflict as various parties struggled for power.