In this essay I will be looking at 3 sources, Many historians agree with the view that the development of the Cold War owed more to soviet expansionism than USA’s economic interests in the years 1945-48. All three of the sources show evidence that soviet expansionism played a huge role in the development of the Cold War. Source 7 especially emphasises Soviet expansionism as the most important factor claiming the USSR were “seeking to expand its influence into Western Europe” causing Western Attitudes to harden. However there is evidence in the sources to support the view that the USA’s economic interests owed more to the development of the Cold War in the years 1945-48. Such as in source 8 which claims the USA wanted a war with the USSR to help its economy, emphasising the impact of the Military Industrial Complex on aggressive foreign policy which played a huge role in the development of the Cold War.
How far was the Korean War a military and political success for the USA? The Korean War was an arena of war between the US and the USSR, the extent to which it was a militant success and a political success was minimal. The outcome of the war produced more military success, than political success, the most important reason being that the US was not able to achieve their target of containment of Communism, and hence, could not unify Korea under a capitalist rule. The USA’s military objective was to prevent the DPNK (North Korea) from invading and taking over ROK (South Korea). It can be said that there was significant military success due to the several militant achievements, for example; the US was able to restore ROK to its former state, prior to the invasion by the DPNK.
Peter had induced over 800 experts to emigrate to Russia, many of whom were military experts. Foreign officers trained the troops, and battles were planned according to German infantry manuals. Shipbuilding was supervised by the Dutch, and the new manufacturing techniques resulted in 800 galleys and 48 ships, which constituted the creation of Russia’s first navy. This resulted in Peter’s victories, notably at Poltava in 1709, against Persia in 1723 and the naval victory at Cape Hango which ensured the collapse of the Swedish empire. This helped Peter strengthen his rule as he was able to consolidate this through military success.
Children were also encouraged to buy 10-cent to 25-cent stamps that they could put into a stamp booklet and eventually raise the $18.75 needed for a full bond. Schools would also have mini bond drives and compete against neighboring schools to raise the most money. To supervise the sale of war bonds the United States Congress required a lot of help; the War Finance Committee was created and put in charge of the 8 bond drives, which lasted from November 29, 1942 to December 8, 1945, and raised over $185.7 billion to cover half of the war cost (US
The weakness of the the crops on the farms in Canada is that not all of their crops lasted all the way through the winter as they would spoil. As well, another weakness was that cattle in Canada (New France) was not able to last during the winter so these habitants had to butcher their farm animals come fall due to not having enough food to feed them. Instead of making them starve to death, they just ended their life fast which helped in providing meat for these farmers. The strength of Canada in considering the types of crops that was on this land is that they produced wheat, vegetables, and live stock. The Canadians worked together in their large families to produce these crops.
The political scene in the USSR also changed for the better during the war—while initially the military reported directly to the Kremlin, Stalin soon appointed an able-bodied leader to the military, Marshal Zhukov, and this allowed the military greater flexibility and, in turn, greater success in battle. The production power of the United States, which made up for slow troop turnouts, was a driving factor in the success of the Allies. FDR’s New Deal policies were partly to
How far was Trotsky responsible for the communist victory during the civil war? Communists have won the civil war due to Trotsky’s leadership, making Trotsky the vital reason for communist success. However other factors like War Communism, Geographical advantage and failure of the White Army also contributed to Communist victory. Trotsky was the leader of the Red Army which he has founded in 1918. The army, by the end of the civil war, reached up to 5 million soldiers.
However, it was intercepted, decrypted, and published in newspapers as propaganda. The telegram and the excessive sea warfare definitely played a part in America going to war, however, there are additional possibilities, if not definite reasons, that lead the U.S. into war. Because of possible economic collapse according to the Glider Lehrman Institute of American History, "By 1917, American loans to the Allies had soared to $2.25 billion; loans to Germany stood at a paltry [measly] $27 million." If not anything else, this would be a huge reason to go to war. Two and a quarter billion dollars is a large sum of money, and if the United States were to lose this money, it would have more than likely been catastrophic and it would've brought about economic collapse in America.
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the civil war was surprising due to the diverse force massed against them. Trotsky’s contribution to the Bolshevik victory was substantial however there were also many other aspects such as Lenin’s contribution, the geographical and structural benefits of the communists and the failures of the anti-communists. Trotsky’s contribution to the Bolshevik victory in the civil war was down to his military leadership. His founding and introduction of the red army in 1918 supported the Communists and enabled them to fight their cause and reinforce their ideas into other Russian people. The use of the Red Army meant that the Communists were considered serious contenders in the Cold war as without it there would be no possibility of them standing their ground.
Assess the reasons for the Bolshevik victory in the Russian civil war Bolshevik victory in the Russian Civil War of 1918 -1920 would not have been certain without the strong, determined and intelligent leadership provided by Trotsky and Lenin. The fact that the Bolsheviks were led by two individuals, who combined had tremendous political, social and military skills had a direct result on the outcome of the war. There were other significant contributing factors that led to the Bolshevik victory, in particular their supreme political policies that completely offered the Russian people what they wanted. For me the main reason why the Bolsheviks did so well and won was due to the Whites were incompetent, disorganised and highly inefficient. The success of the Bolsheviks in the Russian Civil War was due to Lenin, Trotsky and their combined political, social and military capabilities as they were experts.